NOMENCLATURE OF ‘LONDON CATALOGUE.’ 281 
C. vernalis Koch, Syn. ed. 1, 245 (18387). — These citations are 
sufficient to show that Koe h, not Kuetzing, changed verna into 
vernalis, notwithstanding other assertions to the contrary. 
Sedum roseum Scop. Fl. Carn. ed. 2, 826 (1772), precedes 
8. Rhodiola DC. Pl. Graisses, t. 148, et FI. Frang. i iv. 386 (1805). 
Two ponies % the former work to which I referred are imperfect, 
but the copy in the King’s Library, British Museum, has the 
plate Beg 
meee S. Telephium L., var. purpurascens (Koch).—Is not this the 
as the var. . purpureum Li. Sp. Pl. ed. 1,431? The question 
is is propounded by M ee ruce. 
571 rupestre L. Sp. Pl. ed. 1, 481 (1753); Huds. Fl. Angl. 
cites the diagnosis of Linnzus, but adds Ray’s name as a synonym. 
601. Epilobium alsinefolium Vill. Prosp. 45 (1779); Fl. Dauph. 
iii. 511 (1789). EF. oriyanifolia L oa ioe ii. 876 (1786). — Mr. 
Druce states that continaniala use Lamarck'’s name, from 
their overlooking Villars’ first piiation, and only taking up the 
name alsinefolium from his ‘ Flore auphiné 
609. Bryonia dioica Jacq. ” ES ii, 59 t. 199 (1774), not of 
Linneus, who has no such nam: 
628. Trinia vulgaris DC. Prod. iv. 103 (1880).—This consists of 
T. Henningii Hoffm. Umb. 94 (1814), with 7. glaberrima var. Hoffm., 
and other forms adde d. Linnzeus knew nothing of Hoffmann 
639. Pimpinella major var. dissecta ‘* W. i 
a correspondent w. rites, “As there appears to be considerable 
: , see Nyman 
[Consp. 306]; and as W: oth does a Boles to have called 
a variety dissecta, would not this be more correctly named 
laciniata Wallr.? See Sched. Crit. de Plant. Flor. Halens. p. 128 
(1822). If dissecta be preferred, Koch appears to be the authority.” 
There is an initial difficulty in this, as Wallroth, Koch, and others 
use the specific name magna ; but, neglecting this for the moment, 
we find the following :—P. major Huds. P. magna L. Mant. ii. 219 
(1771); — Sched. 122 (1882). P. magna, B. rubra, y. la- 
ciniata, 3. d ; all of Wallroth, /.c. p. 128. The first is a 
reduction oF P. gta: Hoppe in Cent. Exsice. Sawifraga major 
bella rubente, Bauh. Pin. 159. The second, ‘ foliolis [sic] omnib 
fominie he foliolis decussive-pinnatis, laciniis oblongis eee 
patentibus.—P. alia in lacinias dioica, Hist. i. 
third, “ foliis bipinnatiis, foliolis lineari-lanceolatis elongatis.— 
Morls. Hist. F. V. 3." Koch, Syn. ed. 1, 287; ed. 2, 316, 
does not give full iene hence a misapprehension on the part 
ge 
nam 
Exer. Bot. i. 990 eo 
— Myrrhis Odorata Scop. Fl. Carn. ed. 2, i. 107 are 
| ¢ name is spelled with a capital letter, having been 
puniitegily i Rivinus. 
