the Flora Peruviana, that I can hardly persuade myself but 
that it must belong to the same genus, although the perianth 
is monophyllous, and the segments, except in decay, are not 
bent back. It comes much nearer to the plant of the same 
name figured in the Bot. Mag. t. 2496., where likewise the 
perianth appears to be of one piece; but these segments are 
vastly longer, and appear to be unequal. 
Mr Loppicr’s plant, again, appears to be exactly the fe 
some as FEUILLER’s, (v. iii. t. 3. p. 8.) and that of Ruiz and 
Pavon, the blossoms of which are aptly compared in the Bo- 
tanic Cabinet to those ot a Solanum. 
Fig. 1. Flower. Fig. 2. Section of the perianth, laying open the parts of 
the flower. Fig. 3. Pistil and stamens, the, greater part of the perianth 
being removed. Fig. 4. Anther. Fig. 5. Pistil. Fig. 6. Transverse 
Fe eee ESN ak Oe SO ERNE Se 
5 ere sais # ee eany wage 
Be SRE GA a) Pe TE Ni SR en aaa SNE” Ti aE EDN ae EE 
