BRITISH HAWKWEEDS. 149 
Fr. in this Journal (1892, 181, 182), we may observe that we at 
first made out the Braemar plant to be 1. onosmoides Fr. ourselves ; 
Fr., and affirmed the other (from 
the Linn of Dee) to be another species which he knew, but had not 
named. Later on we became acquainted with the description of 
Mons. Arvet-Touvet’s plant, and sent specimens from Skye, Brae- 
ms 
TR 
_— 
S 
0Q 
0 
6 
— 
et 
° 
ie 
@ 
=) 
= 
S 
s 
3 
= 
Sy 
We ha Arvet-Touvet’s distinct opinion in reply that our plan 
were his buglossoides, and not H. onosmoides Fr. As all our gatherings 
agree well wi Arvet-Touvet’s description, and do not fit 
equally well Fries’ description or Lindeberg’s specimens of H. onos- 
moides, we adopt M. Arvet-Touvet’s name, Ce) 
regard this widely dispersed plant of ours as a different species to 
H. onosmoides F tected among Mr. Hanbury’s numerous 
doubtful plants a rather poor specimen 0 ¢ 
Minhiagh, Innishowen, N. Ireland, collected by Mr. H. C. 
a plant rather like our shadegrown specimens of H. buglossoides from 
the Yarrow, near Selkirk, which he names H, saxifragum Fr. var. 
pseudonosmoides, n. subsp. This is not at all identical with our 
series of Moffat plants, but it shows that there is resemblance 
to be very seare 
a possible product of H. Oreades and this species, A very different 
proad-leaved form, a striking-looking plant, comes from rocks near 
Llyn Ogwen, Carnarvon ; Mr. Hanbury has found a similar plant 
to this by the R. Elan, Radnor. 
(To be continued.) 
