BRITISH HAWEWEEDS. 201 
the R. Clunie, Braemar, *S. err with this — Also a 
plant by the Naver, Bettyhill, *W. Sutherland, fine and 
aypices; collected by us in 1888; and by the R. Gada fk aes, 
*Outer Hebrides, gathered and sent unnamed by Col. J. W. 
nigtucee 
H. bade eale Fr., var. virgultorum (Jord.). Wallis Down, Dorset. 
Named for us by M. Arvet-Touvet. This variety has a clean-cut 
look, having all the stem-leaves subsimilar, ovate-lanceolate to 
ovate-acuminate, coriaceous, subglabrous on the upper surface; 
stem rather thinly hairy; phyllaries drying a jak olive-green. 
boreale Fr., var. Herviert Arv.-Touvet (Hervier, Hier. Has. 
Soc. Dauph. ii. 376). Lytchett Minster; and Verwood; _Dorset. 
exa 
<: 
7 
ones subglabrous above; involucres drying a dull greenish-black. 
mbellatum var. coronopifolium Fr. Wallis Down, and Lyt- 
chett Minwies Dorset (specimens of these were sent to M. Arvet- 
Touvet labelled by one of us as this variety, and confirmed by him, 
the Wallis Down form of the plant emphatically); also near 
Queen’s Wood, Horton, in the same county; between Mere and 
Mere Down, Wilts; near Blackslough, Somerset. A form from 
ee near Witley, Surrey, collected in company with the Rev. 
. 8. Marshall, comes near coron seg oltion and may perhaps best 
- placed under it. The variety as Pag in this country has 
a close panicle, with rigid perive or suberect peduncles. The leaves, 
however, are the main character, by Fries ipti 
J h, of Bangor, at two stations on the Carnarvonshire 
coast, about fifteen miles apart, viz., Abersoch and Morfa Bychan, 
ich remin n ar. monticola Jordan, but seems to be 
so far u 8 lant is always dwarf in stature, 
var. curtum Linton. It aR besides in the neat few- 
flowered panicles of rather lar ov s, rather short peduncles 
somewhat spreading, broad oe outer phyllaries much reflexed 
at the tip, only those on the peduncle pees narrow ; the leaves 
- 
upper ones being often entire or nearly so. The style is pure yellow 
in the Abersoch plant, livid yellow at Morfa Bychan. Another 
plant from Carnarvonshire, gathered near eat in 1890 by one 
of us, perhaps ought to find its place under H. umbellatum as a 
variety, but is so ‘much off in the direction of the gothicum group 
that it may deserve specific rank. In cultivation it maintains its 
peculiarities; it stands over at present for further consideration. 
The following variety was accidentally omitted from its proper 
place in this list, the order of which has been very carefully con- 
sidered, in oS ee with Mr. Hanbury, and it is added here at 
the end of our pap 
H., stenolepis Lindeb., var. anguinum W.R. Linton. Basal leaves 
