NOTES ON THE FLORA Of BERKSHIRE, 829 
probability of being correct. Mr. gpa ere many 
records to the Newbury list, but they are so full of gross in- 
accuracies as to throw doubt on all his lca Ear ecords 
of Lathyrus palustris L., Illecebrum verticillatum L., Polycarpon tetra- 
albida Br., and Alliwn Scorodoprasum L. are all erroneous. The. 
list of plants pout epons Pangbourne by Mr. peau also contains 
several misn urtistt Forst. is a form of V. tri- 
color L. pati ates Fo gee! L. requires vercmepn om Pegs eH 
Forsterianum Sm. is probably a mistake for S. reflecum L.; hi 
Myosotis sylvatica is M. arvensis var. umbrosa; his Caeda ine im- 
atiens Li. is C. sylvatica.—Cephalanthera ensifolia is not. correct ; 
incisum is a variety of L. purpurewm; and there are doubts as to 
the correctness of Carduus tenuiflorus, Artemisia Absinthium, and 
Habenaria bifo 
Other ei which are errors are-——-Geranium sylvaticum in 
Bot. Guide for G. pratense L. —— Drosera anglica Huds. To this 
is referred Bobart’s record in Morison’s Hist. iii. 620; but Bobart 
not discriminate between D. anglica and D. intermedia ; both 
probable ; so far, it has eluded me.—Pyrus scandica, which Prof. 
Babington mentions from shoes va, but which Dr. Syme wa 
pvc * find, may be rediscovered.——Chrysosplenium alternifolium, 
a Berks plant on faith “of the Cliefden Wood locality, but 
Ehis Salas to Bucks.—Bagley Wood, given in my Flora of Oxon 
on faith of Rev. E. Fox, is an error for C. See mmr Sone 
virosa dt = Wellington list is an error, as is the record in my Flor 
of O y Rey. E. Fox.—-Rubia peregrina L. In the ae Fb 
aa ‘of A rast or Inkpen, Reeks. A very improbable record.— 
Hieracium murorum, from the downs above W. Woodhay and from 
walls at Elcot, by Mr. Reeks, is a probable misnomer for A. 
atum. — Scrophularia Ehrhartii Bier Near Cumnor. A mis- 
nomer ; the plant from there is 9. nodosa L. var. Bobartii Pryor.— 
Limosella aquatica L. The al locality is in Oxon. —- Orobanche 
cerulea Vill. Near Cookham, but the purple- flowered form of 
O. minor was mistaken for it,— Stachys germanica L. According to 
Bromfield, in Phyt, iii. 685, is plentiful in Berks, but never Moreaacy 
It is also recorded from Ducklington, but that parish is in Oxon, 
The plant should ee found on the north side of the coralline oolite 
plateau.—The station for Asarum ewropeum L., between Henley and 
Maidenhead, is hist likely in Bucks. —- Potamogeton heterophyllus 
Se i i 
I am inclined to think incorrect, as is Mr. Tufnail’s Burghfield 
record in Flora Oxf., which more Likely belongs to P. rufescens.~= 
P, heterophyllus is a plant which should occur. 
