374 SHORT NOTES. 
Spr.], maculata (L.) [Pursch], japonica [Miq.] OK. Die Citate 
pape To fiir Sag, die in [] fiir Chimophila, Welche Art oder 
ob tberhaupt eine Art von Rafinesque benannt i st, weiss ich nicht, 
in 
I more especially perce was the practice of inventing a series 
of new names under a § dor the establishment of which no 
sufficient evidence was fortheoit ing. If Dr. Kuntze had followed 
why Dr. Kuntze speaks of ‘ Chimophila Pursch.” Pursh wrote 
n rpuas- 
cens’’ for J. Senet Muell. Tt is to be regretted that some 
more useful or at least les for th 
superabundant eae of ‘liiah Prof. Greene seems to be ‘possessed. 
James Brr 
Urricunaria INTERMEDIA IN Hast Norronx. — In August last we 
found this plant, in considerable abundance, in the very wet fenland 
bordering on Stalham and Barton Broads, a nd by the river Aut, 
in the same neighbourhood. The distribution 3 the plant in 
England, as recorded in the To pographical Botany, is very curious 
. Benne tha 
thinking that Kirby Trimmer’s plant might be U. neglecta. Watson 
mentions insufficiently vouched records for Devon, Somerset, Bucks, 
i und i 
ther fenland and pe 
records for oe Scottish counties, in addition to the eight given 
in Topographical Botany, showing Std it is generally distributed 
Seesnghout | Scotland.t—H. & J. Gro 
Oxyria in Norra Lancasuine, — in August 7th last, Mr. W. 
Piiekydith ae Ulverston, found Owyria digyna at Tilberthwaite, 
ne =. Conisto act a new record for N, Lancs. I have seen specimens. 
—ListE 
racial —In the Rev. E. 8. Marshall’s paper on Potentilla- 
Hybrids (pp. 825-7) occur the following misprints, which it seems 
desirable to correct :—p. $25, line 2 from bottom, for “ Ham Moor, 
* Erythea, 1893, pp. 114, 115, 
t Since writing the above, we hear that U. intermedia has been — from 
be t Norfolk by Mr. Geldart in Trans. Norf. & Norw. Nat. Soc. 1889-90.— 
