444 ^' Brunetti : Oriental Bomhylidce, [Voi^. II, 



Loc. — Bengal [t. auct.]; Belgatchia (Calcutta), August 1906; 

 Bombay Presid., 21-111-1905, on seaweeds [Pusa Coll., t. m.]. Types 

 In the Fabricius collection. 



3. latipennis, mihl, sp. nov., 9 . 



Loc. — Assam (Shillong). Type in Indian Museum. 



N.B. — These three species can be separated from the others 

 In this genus by the practically wholly black or blackish brown 

 wings. In my species they are wholly blacky whereas in pcnnipes 

 the extreme tip is clear, whilst in lar the distal portion of the 

 posterior border is rather narrowly clear. 



4. flavipennis, mihi, sp. nov., ? . 



IvOC, — Bengal (Pusa), 19-IV-1907 [Pusa Coll., type], and Pusa, 

 25-V-1906 [Ind. Mus. Coll., co-type]. 



N.B. — Easily recognised from all other species b^^ the closed 

 ist posterior cell, in conjunction with the bright yellow wings, 



5. flammea, mihi, sp. nov., 9 . 



Loc. — Bengal (Pusa) [type, Pusa, i7-iv-i907, Pusa Coll.], 

 Trivandrum (S. Ind.) [Ind. Mus.]. 



N.B. — This is the only other species except insulata, Wlk., 

 with closed ist posterior cell : it has clear wings with two brown 

 bands. 



6. collaris, Wied., 1828, Auss. Zwei., i, 271 {Anthrax). 



Anthrax ruficollis, Saund., Tr. Ent. So. lyond. 

 (1841), ill, 59, pi. V, 5 (full insect 9 , 

 coloured). 

 Anthrax collaris, Wlk., List Dip. Brit. Mus., 



11, 247, 9 . 

 Exoprosopa hinotata, Mcq., Dip. Ex. Supp., 5, 

 89, d^. 

 Loc. — Madras [t. Walker] ; Central India [t. Saunders] , India 

 [t. Macq.]; Bangalore, Trivandrum (both South India), Sahlbganj 

 (Bengal) [Ind. Mus. Coll., t. m.]. 



Plate xii, fig. 16 (wing). Type in Vienna Museum. 

 N.B. — I have practically no doubt whatever as to the syno- 

 nymy given here, and the fact that Wiedemann's type came ' * prob- 

 ably " from the Cape is not sufficient to discard the Identity. 

 Saunders, in describing his ruficollis, gives an excellent coloured 

 plate which is unmistakeable , and refers to its affinity to the older 

 author's species, though fearing the descriptions of the wing did 

 not quite agree with his specimen. Wiedemann's description, how- 

 ever, appears exact enough ; his ' ' guttula ' ' referring to the 

 very smaU sub-hyaline spot in the 2nd basal cell, adjoining the 

 very base of the discal cell ; and this spot is referred to by 

 Macquart, in his hinotata, as follows, " un point a la base de la 

 cellule discoldale. ' ' 



Wiedemann's '' excisura, aplceque llmpldls " is, of course, 

 correct, and Macquart' s description also applies. Moreover I am 

 assured of the identity of this latter author's hinotata by his mention 



