REPORT OF THE STATE ENTOMOLOGIST I915 35 



Webster orchard, plot 3 (sprayed three times), 1915 



Drops . . . 

 Picked . . 

 Total . . . 

 Per cent . 



Drops . . . 

 Picked. . 

 Total . . . 

 Per cent. 



Drops. . . 

 Picked . . 

 Total . . . 

 Per cent. 



Drops. . . 

 Picked . . 

 Total . . . 

 Per cent. 



Drops . . . 

 Picked . . 

 Total. . . 

 Per cent . 



Drops. . . 

 Picked . . 

 Total . . . 

 Per cent . 



Grand total . 

 Per cent 



3 056 

 3 540 



226 

 2 684 

 2 910 



403 

 3 459 

 3 862 



400 



2 900 



3 300 



342 

 4 622 

 4 964 



310 

 3 153 

 3 463 



261 

 2 475 

 2 736 

 77.28 



14s 

 2 146 

 2 291 

 78.72 



232 

 2 607 

 2 839 

 73.51 



241 

 2 097 



2 338 

 70.84 



109 



3 455 

 3 564 

 71.79 



221 

 2 712 

 2 933 

 84.40 



16 701 



75-77 



145 



377 



522 



14.74 



44 



361 



405 



13.91 



104 



673 



777 



20. II 



99 



637 



736 



22.30 



927 

 I 008 

 20.30 



203 



223 



6.43 



3 671 

 16.65 



LEAF 

 ROLLER 



OR 

 GREEN 

 FRUIT 

 WORM 



65 



168 



233 



6.58 



26 

 128 



154 



5. 29 



42 

 no 



152 

 3.95 



37 



139 



176 



5.33 



42 



148 



190 



3.82 



29 



104 



133 



3.84 



I 038 



4.70 



CODLING MOTH, WORMY 



Total 



30 



82 



112 



3.16 



17 

 69 



86 



2.95 



34 



97 



131 



3-39 



38 



69 



107 



3-24 



57 



160 



217 



4-37 



49 



161 



210 



6.06 



863 

 3.91 



End 



Side 

 July 



29 



80 



109 



3.07 



17 



69 



86 



2.95 



32 



97 



129 



3.34 



35 



69 



104 



3. IS 



57 



160 



217 



4-37 



160 

 208 

 6. 



853 

 3.87 



Side 

 August 



The yield of this plot approximates that of the first, individual 

 trees varying from 2910 to 4964 apples and the percentage of wormy 

 ranging from 2.95 to 6.06. There is a wider variation in the wormy 

 fruit than obtains on trees in the other plots, though the average for 

 the plot is decidedly less thai^i in plot i and only a little more than in 

 plot 2. This discrepancy is probably explainable by variations in 

 application which it is almost impossible to avoid under practical 

 conditions. Here as in the preceding plots, the greater proportion 

 of the wormy fruit has been injured by the late-hatching larvae of the 

 first brood, only .04 per cent being end wormy. 



