SYNONYMS IN THE DESMIDIACEA) AND PROTOCOCCOIDE 63 
. CG. conspersum ——- p- 97, f. 186). M. Bernard’s figure has 
no relationship whatever with C. conspersum Ralfs, and this deter- 
mination almost more shad any other shows the author’s complete 
ignorance of the systematics of ae Desmudiacee. 
C. equale (Bern. p. 100, f. 141, 142). Not C. 9s Turn. but 
C. pseudoprotuberan Kirehn. var. SSE Nor 
C. Scenedesmus Delp. var., punctatum (Bern. p 47) = 
C. oe ame the fibrillar jelly ones as Pde rare 
f vatum (Bern. p. 104, f. 150) = C. retusiforme (Wille) 
utw 
DUO. microsphinctum ricoh forma parvulum (Bern. p. 104, 
-f. 151) = C.granatum Bréb. ! 
C. beta Nordst. var. _angustius Bern. (p. 105, f. 152, 153) 
= C. pseudopyramidatum Lund. 
C. Pesci se acess p. 106, f. 154). Whatever this may be it 
is not C. nitidulum De Notaris. 
C. elliz esi (Bern. p. 106, f. 155). Most likely either a 
form of G. a Lund. or 6. i tum Nordst., but the 
figure is insuffici o determine the te 
C. pyran oe rdst.” (Bern. - ‘io7, f. 158, 159) = the 
C. “pseudotaniohondrum (Bern. p. 109, f. 16 3). There is not the 
slightest evidence to show that M. Bernard’s figure belongs to 
this species 
C. Regnesi Reinsch var. minimum Bern. (p. 109, f. 164, 165). This 
is one of the very commones forms of C. Regnest, a pee which 
lished description 
C, peer, amen ‘Reinsch var. bogoriense Bern. (p. 116, f. 181, 
t "1 =o mite fee W. & G. S. West (1895). 
) r 
Basaioun dideltoides W. ahs wa i fs (848) w. 
Bern. p. 121, f. 198) = typica idelta (Turp.) Ralfs 
“E. ne oa = s (Bern. p. 126-130, f. 207- 
211). All the author's swore a en of ic “inermius N ordst., 
and had the author examined the forms of this species whi ch 
occur in the tropics of both the New and Old Worlds he cade not 
have made the observations on pp. 126- 
inale (Turp.) Ralfs var. wees Bern. (p. at 130, f. 215, 
216) = E. crispulum (Nordst.) W. & G s 
Oe (Br b. ate var. brevius — - (P. 131, f. 217, 218) 
oe no o relationship whatever with E. elegan 
