160 THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY 
shape, very clearly defined, occupying only about one-third the 
width of the cell cavity; and therefore, when viewed with a low 
plant, and it is quite conceivable that under slightly different con- 
ditions of drying, &e., £. Mangifere might exhibit the same 
pec ter of fact, Sedgwick’s plant does 
exhibit a distinctly intermediate character, the cell plasma fre- 
quently being contracted in exactly th e way n Mitten’ 
specimens, though without the peculiar appearance caused by the 
ll ends. 
and that of C. Miiller are identical. In this case it would appear 
that—unfortunate though it may seem, since Mitten’s species was 
ler’s 
ey, 
‘‘ Hingereicht am 5 Novbr. 1 1”) Bellit was publis i 
ourn. of Linn. Soc. vol. xiii. (Bot.), and the part in which it 
occurs was issu arch 21st, 1873. 
Erpodium Mangifere C. M. in Linnea xxxvii. 178 ie ae 
Syn. H. Belli Mitt. in Journ. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) xiii. 307 
(March, 1873). 
_ Mr. Sedgwick’s plant had a single loose fragment of a capsule, 
but otherwise only exhibited male flowers. It is greatly to be 
hoped that Mr. Sedgwick may be able to gather it in fruit, and so 
confirm the identity with Mitten’s plant. 
Preropryopsis Maxwenut Card. & Dixon, sp. nov. (Plate 4978, 
1-4), Among specimens sent from Western India by Mr. L. J. 
as an undescribed species of Pterobry- 
opsis allied to Meteorium Hookeri (Mitt.) (Calyptothecitwm Hookeri 
Broth.). The genus Pterobryopsis was founded by Fleischer in 
1901, and described in Hedwigia, vol, xly. p- 56 (1905), to include 
