SHORT NOTES 3538 
Vv 
Mosses, Characee, Hepatic, and Lichens by Hooker, and th 
edition of that work. 
The following are the more important differences between the 
two editions: exhaustive examination might yield others. It is 
Continental authors until it was revived by the Rev. A. Ley in 
stituting in its stead R. Sherardi; especially at p. 384, n. 10, 
where the following reference should be added after the specific 
- 
in the two editions are identical up to p. 360; the insertion on 
remains the same. For purposes of citation the second and more 
generally known edition is the one usually quoted: the Index 
Kewensis, however, seems rightly to have used the first, as is 
F. G. WILTSHEAR. 
SHORT NOTES. 
Larayrus tuperosus L. in SurroLnk.—A specimen of this 
plant from the herbarium of Samuel Dale is in the British 
ffolekie invenit. similar specimen i 
(Herb. Sloane, 119, f. 23), but without locality. The plant is not 
inentioned in Hind’s Flora of Suffolk, and was first recorded for the 
the flora of the county—e. g. Lathyrus palustris, specimen of 
which is on the same folio of Herb. Sloane, labelled: “I found it 
