SHORT NOTES 447 
botanist, and yet we find: Heterophile Pansy, Pansy of the Mont 
Cenis, Superb Pink, Rivulet Cranesbill (G. rivulare), Dodonceus’s 
French Willo (Epi tum Dodonei = Fleischeri), Feetid 
oserid (Asposeris fatida), Alpine Balsam (Lrinus alpinus), 
Scutate Dock asta. serisiae and such combinations as Beards’ 
ye Flared on n ’s is tropis (O. campestre). It is bad 
to put an English name to epson plant, and even to those which 
never occur in Britain ?—H. S. THompson 
APLOZIA RIPARIA var. POTAMOPHILA IN YORKSHIRE.— About 
two years ago I collected an Aplozia in a stream, and 
referred it to A. cordifolia. On subsequent investigation I wa 
dissatisfied with this naming, and decided to it a form of 
of about 900 ft., in Greenfi field, Yorks, v.-c. 63, id is associated 
with Chiloseyphus pallescens, Pellia epiphylla, Sousa undulata 
and its var rpurascens, Hypnum faleatum, H. commutatum, 
Bryum pseudotriquetrum, Philonotis fontana, Hurynchium rusci- 
orme, Dicranella squarrosa, D. Schreberi, and Mnium punctatum. 
It is found in other upland streams of the district, but _ have 
have hitherto seen, and has a great resemblance to A. sordifelia 
p to the present, as far as I am aware, this variety has only been 
recorded from Scotland aid the Isle of Man, though its range will 
probably be See extended when its characters become 
better known.—W. 
FUMARIA OCCIDENTALIS Pugsley.—In my recent Pape’ (p. 413) 
I have stated with reference to the above plant, “ Found b 
Mr. H. W. Pugsley at Penzance and cise iai in Cornwall in 
1902,” which facts seemed to me to be naturally inferred from 
S$ paper in this = ournal for 1904. I have since, how- . 
ever, been informed by my friend Dr. C. C. Vigurs that this is an 
imperfect and misleading ae che of the case, for he had himself 
observed the plant at New te! as far back as 1898 and had called 
the attention of Mr. Hume to it, and they i — it ~ 
not answer to the Ssenripicn of any then 
igurs then made several attempts to get the ti. gue by 
some specialist, but unfortunately without success. It seems to 
me important t that these facts, of which there is no hint in 
Mr. Pugsley’s paper, should be recorded, so that Dr. Vigurs should 
have due credit for a very interesting discovery.—-W. A. CLARKE. 
GYROPHORA spopocHROA Ach.—In reference to our note 
(p. 431) with regard to the first discovery of this lichen in Britain, 
we now find that Mr. J. A. Martindale recorded it, with a full 
