1920] 



TA YLOR— SUCCESSION OF MOSSES 



491 



LITERATURE CITED 



x. Braun, E. Lucy, The vegetation of conglomerate rocks of the Cincinnati 



region. Plant World 20:380-392. 191 7. 

 2. Cooper, W. S., Ecological succession of mosses on Isle Royale, Lake 



Superior. Plant World 15:197-213. 1912. 



3« Cowles, H. C, The plant societies of Chicago and vicinity. Chicago. 

 1901. 



4. Emig, W. H., Mosses as rock builders. Bryologist 21:25-27. 1918. 



5. Evans, A. W., and Nichols, G. E., The bryophytes of Connecticut. 

 Hartford. 1908. 



6. Fuller, G. D., Evaporation and soil moisture in relation to the succession * 

 of plant associations. Bot. Gaz. 58:193-234. 1914. 



7. Grout, A. J., Mosses with a hand lens and microscope. New York. 

 1905. 



8. Oltmanns, F., tJber die Wasserbewegung in der Moospflanze und ihrer 

 Einfluss auf die Wasservertheilung im Boden. Cohn's Beitrage 4:1887. 



9- Salisbury, R. D., and Alden, Wm. C, The geography of Chicago and its 



environs. Chicago. 1899. 

 10. Shelford, V. E., Animal communities in temperate America. Chicago. 



1913- 

 IX. Taylor, Ara villa M., Mosses as formers of tufa and of floating islands. 



Bryologist 23:38-39. 1919. 

 12. Ulrich, F. T., The relation of evaporation and soil moisture to plant 

 succession in a ravine. Bull. 111. State Lab. Nat. Hist. 12:1-16. 1915. 



13- Warming, Eug., Lehrbuch der okologischen Pflanzengeographie. 2d 

 German ed. 1 21-122. 1902. 



14- Warnstorf, C, Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg 1:20-25. 



1903. 







