OVERLOOKED PLANTS DESCRIBED BY SCHREBER 3438 
‘‘ Lipsie Halam missa, d. 18. Februar. 1765,” and the second, 
‘“‘Lipsia Halam missa d. 12. Februar. 1769’; the printed dates 
are however sufficient to ensure for the names given the priority 
here claimed for them. In two cases the application of the Vienna 
rules has rendered new combinations necessary. 
adhe ys RACEMOSUM (Decade I, 3). 
Persoon, Lehmann, A. P. De Candolle, and authors generally, 
down ta “the Indea Rissense. adopt for this plant Willdenow’s name 
angustifolium, with which authors are agreed it is identical. Both 
Schreber and Willdenow, however, base their description on Tourne- 
fort’s “ * Oyaitiglodsaiin orientale minu 8, flore campanulato ceruleo, 
ati A 
ant is now referred to Paracar iia under which it must take its 
sirliogt specific name; it will stand a 
PaRACARYUM RACEM 
Cynoglossum ielaacegn Schreb. in Nov. Act. Nat. Cur, iii. 475 
( 
767). 
C. angustifolium Willd. Sp. Pl. i. 768 (1797); Pers. Syn. i. 160 
1805) ; Lehmann, Asperifol. 171 (1818); Index Kevenas de. 
Partie angustifolium Boiss. Fl. Or. iv. 263 (1879). 
TRIFOLIUM oer too i, oS 
This name is not taken up in the Flora Orientalis and is retained 
as distinct in J; pies. saealtget li is sdetails with the plant generally 
known m Willd., as noted by Dryander in the National 
Herbarium, w res we have a specimen from Tournefort, on whose 
** Trifolium ereticum elegantissimum magno fiore” both Schreber 
and Willdenow base their descriptions. “Schreber’s ae must of 
course supersede Willdenow’s, as sa : nee dates will show 
TriroLium GRANDIFLoRUM Schreb. in Nov. Act. Cur. iii. “WI7 (1767). 
T. speciosum Willd. Sp. Pl. iii. re *(1800) et auct. 
ALIUM JuncEuM (Decade I, 8). 
name is not taken up in the Flora Orientalis nor in De 
ta 
A 
ich he 
specimens to Linnzus, as mentioned by the latter a 
the species (Mant. 38); and he himself describes it in his second 
Decade (no. 8), with a reference to Linnzus but no Wits rE 
Figures of Prosper Alpinus are cited by Sehrebet "ie each of the 
species, and it seems impossible to suppose that they can be in- 
tended to represent the same plant. In the absence of any clue in 
the Herbarium, the identification of og junceum must be left to 
someone well acquainted with the gen 
PHASEOLUS TRILOBATUS be Il, Fi tab. iv.). 
Under this name Schreber places two plants usually regarded as 
distinet— Dolichos trilobatus L. (Mant. 101) ( Phassaitas trilobus Ait. 
Hort. Kew. iii. 30) and Phaseolus aconitifolius Jacq. (Obs. iii. 2, staal 
Linneus’ s plant is based on the ‘‘ Phaseolus maderaspatensis, ca 
