458 
BOTANICAL GAZETTE [DECEMBER 
tures are homologous with those of the Pezizineae, and that Leotia 
is closely related to the Pezizineae. 
The writer is greatly indebted to Professor D. S. Jonnson for 
valuable suggestions and criticisms, and to Professor C. B. DAVEN- 
PORT for courtesies shown him during his stay at the Biological 
Laboratory of the Brooklyn Institute at Cold Spring Harbor. 
v 
THE Jouns Hopkins UNIVERSITY 
BAttimmore, Mp. 
LITERATURE CITED 
Barker, P. T. B., The morphology and development of the ascocarp in 
Monascus. ‘Aihate of Botany 1'7:167—236. 1903. 
, Further observations on a ascocarp of Ryparobius. Rept. 
Bich AAS., ats 825-826. 1904. 
BLackMAN, V. H., On the serene alternation of generations, and — 
general cytology of the Uredineae. Annals of Botany 18:323~-36o9. 
1904. 
, and Fraser, H. C. I., On the sexuality and development of the 
ascocarp of Humaria granulata. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B '7'7:354- 
368. 1906. 
Brown, W. H., Nuclear anener in Pyronema confluens. Johns 
Hopkins aceeiten Circ. 6242-45. 
6. 
“I 
, Nuclear phenomena in jersey scutellata. Science 31:436-437. 
1gIo. 
. Cuttinc, E. M., On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp in 
Ascophanus carneus Pers. Annals of Botany 23:399-417. 1909. 
‘CraussEN, P., Zur Kenntnis der Kernverhiltnisse von Pyronema con- 
jluens. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. 25:586-590. 1907 
DANGEARD, P., La reproduction sexuelle des Ascomycétes. Le Botaniste 
4:21-58. 1895. 
ENGLER, A., Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Berlin. 1907. 
Favt1, J. H., Development of ascus and spore-formation in Ascomycetes. 
Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 32:77~—114. 1905. 
Fraser, H. C. I., Contributions to the cytology of Humaria rutilans. 
Annals of Botany 22:35-55. 1 
———., On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp in Lachnea 
stercorea. Annals of Botany 21:349-360. 1907. 
GUILLIERMOND, M. A., Remarques sur la karyokinése des Ascomycétes. 
Ann. Mycol. 3:344-361. 1905. 
Harper, R. A., Ueber das Verhalten der Kerne bei der Fruchtentwicklung 
einiger Ascomyceten. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 29:655-685. 18096. 
