NOTES’ ON INDIGOFERA 67 
This plant must not be confused with J. madagascariensis Vatke in 
Bremen. Abh. vii. (1882), p. 245, also, as the name implies, from 
Madagascar. J. cinerascens DC. Prodr. ii. 226 (1825) must also be 
reduced to I. tinctoria. 
I. rincroria 8 sracuycarpa DC. Prod. ii. p. 225 (1825), ‘ legu- 
minibus abbreviatis crassioribus 8-4 spermis. J. Guatimala Lun. 
ort. Jam. i. p. 420. Fl. Mex. ic. ined.? An species propria ? 
I, brachycarpa Graham in Wall. Cat. 5470 = I. tinctoria L. var. 
brachycarpa Baker, non DC., is a synonym of J. argentea L. var. 
polyphylla DC.), without precise locality. One of the two is from 
L’Héritier, the other of unknown origin. (2) A third specimen of 
the same form from Trianon. (8) A specimen of the wild form of 
I. guatinalensis Mogino, Sessé & Cervantes in Herb. De oer. 
c. ined.; Poeppig MSS. in Herb. Brit. Mus. ; MSS. e 
Herb. De Candolle. Z ; ; re 
I. tinctoria var. B brachycarpa DO. Prodr. ii. 224 (1825) mm part; 
Berg in Berg. & Schmidt, Offiz. Gewach. iv. (1863) in part; 
Urban in Plant. Sintenis, no. 5604. 
Besides the Prodromus Herbarium examples, we have seen the 
following specimens of this plant :—Guatemala, Bernouillt é Cario, 
no. 1189, Herb. Kew.; Sintenis, no. 5604, Herd. Brit. Mus. Ve- 
hezuela, Fendler, no. 1795; Herb. Kew. Central America, Ruiz é 
Pavon; Herb. Brit. Mus. Suburbs of Guayaquil, Jameson, no. 338; 
Herb, Brit. Mus. Cuba, Ramon de la Sagra, no. 94. “ Indigofera 
“2 Shatemala, cult 4 la Havane.” Pera, Dombey, no. 872; Poeppiy; 
9. 1572, 
(To be continued.) 
ere Seer 
