379 



costa, and faintly sinuate above and below middle; a fuscous- 

 oclireous rather broad transverse fascia immediately beyond 

 second fascia, and only separated by a fine line of white 

 throughout; the fascia is strongly indented above and below 

 middle and followed throughout by a well-marked narrow 

 parallel line; a fine blackish interrupted line along termen, 

 preceded by minute white spots; cilia fuscous-ochreous, ter- 

 minal half barred with white, a fine blackish median line 

 throughout. Hindwings with termen rounded; dull whitish, 

 thickly overlaid with fuscous; two waved, whitish, transverse 

 parallel lines, anterior from costa at three-fifths to just above 

 anal angle, second line more obscure ; cilia as in forewings, 

 but white bars less pronounced. 



One specimen, in March, at light. 



I am not satisfied with the position of this species, and 

 I much doubt whether it is an Emmiltis. The palpi and 

 antennae appear to suggest a new genus, but I consider my 

 material insufficient to erect one at present. 



184. EUCHLORIS VERTUMNARIA, Gn. 



Two specimens, in May. 



185. EUCHLORIS ALBICOSTA, Wlk. 



Five specimens, in March. 



186. Hypochroma occultaria, Don. 



Rather scarce here ; two specimens, November and 

 December. 



187. PSEUDOTERPNA ARGYRASPIS, LoW. 



Two specimens, beaten from Eucalyptus, in March. 



188. Xenochlaena porphyropa, Low. 



The type, taken in October, is still unique. The name 

 is misprinted por-phyropis. Ante, 1903, p. 192. 



Subfamily SELIDOSEMIDAE. 



189. Osteodes procurata, Wlk. 

 Two specimens, in October. 



190. COSYMBIA'2) penthearia, Gn. 

 Four specimens, at light, in November. 



(2) Mr. Meja-ick, in 1891, 55iirmised that probably this genus 

 extended right across the interior of Australia, from 'east to west,, 

 without touching the coast, and my experience tends to support 

 the theorv. 



