CRITICAL STUDY OF RANUNCULUS AQUATILIS L. VAR. y 13 
1879. R. ci Rion ex Wolf. in Bull. Soe. Murith. vii- 
1881. R. cibiillaté nad Touvet Ess. Pl. Dauphiné, 18. 
1893. R. dolichopodus A. Kerner ap. Freyn in Zeitschr. Ferdinand. 
Tirol, 35 heft, 266. 
BATRACHIUM. 
1821. B. pantothrix 8, F. Gray Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. ii. 722. 
23 capillaceum Bercht. & Presl sete ii. Ranuncul. 49. 
3, 114. 
ae 
1843. B. eradicatum Leestad. in Bot. Not. 
1845. B. confervoides Fries in Bot. Not. 1845, 121. 
1850. B. Lai kt Van den Bossche Prodr. fl. Bat. 7. 
1852. B. Drowetit Nyman in Bot. Not. 1852, 98. 
1859. B. ‘sate Nyl. & Seellan Herb. Mus. Fennici, 35. 
1865. B. lutulentum Nyman Syll. Pl. Eur. suppl. 29. 
1866. B. divaricatum Schur Enum. PI. Transsilv. 12; non Wim- 
mer (1841). 
1869. B. erie Rupr. ie Caucasi, 15. 
1877. B. minimum Schur in Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brinn, xv. 11. 28. 
1878. B. caetbaiin Nein Consp. fl. Eur. 15; non 8. ¥. ‘Guat 
1821 
1878. B. pectinatum Nyman Consp. fi. Eur. 
1878. B. Rionit Nyman Consp. fl. Eur. 15; non Nyman Syll. Pl. 
Kur. 174 (1854). 
1889. B. pienifirees Nyman Consp. fi. Eur. suppl. ii. 10 (sub 
n. 6). 
There seems to be now no doubt that R. aquatilis L. var.. 
with due regard to the subsequent synonymy, comprehends 
h in English floras are found under the names of 
ue Foeniculum ua icum ium,” e sr anes 0 é 
“ganz gut”; and which without doubt represents the oes 
mentioned in French floras as “ &. Drouetit, 
many English and» 
® fact which is also borne out by the description whieh accom- 
