216 ‘REPORT OF BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOR 1882. 
1873. Will — botanists now search out these forms and help — 
—AR Bre O 
Professor Lange ? THUR Bennett. On subsequently sending 
Mr. Bennett ripe fruit of sci capes s plant, he writes, ‘‘ I now 
think it O. repens ; it will belong to a. inermis Lange, Prod. Flor. 
Hisp., spinis omnino Re t while i my Norfolk specimens belong 
to ‘b. horrida Lange, Pro d. Flor. Hisp., spinis sat t crebris $-1 
aus: aad Lisa doves divergentibus arcuata.’ 
i Tae te dica Syme ?—Great Doward, Herefordshire, 2nd June, 
.G. Baker. It appears to me to come nearer “scandica.”—A. Ley. 
T queried this as latifolia or Avia, and Mr. Archer Briggs replies: 
‘* Certainly not latifolia, which I know well. I believe it ought to 
go under Aria or rupicola. Whatever may be the case with regard 
to latifolia and scandica, I am led b my ape ee to think that 
Boswell’s eu-Aria and r rupicola are sO co ted by intermediates 
that for certain plants it is impossible to ‘alive between the two 
names.” This is certainly a puzzling plant. I agree with the Rev. 
veins, 
rupicola, if the latter be considered deserving of aname. Year by 
hate I incline more to the belief that P. rupicola is P. eu-Aria 
ing in uncongenial contitons—poo soil, exposure to wind, or 
deicien heat.—J. T. Bos 
Sed a Forstenonin ‘Bin var. virescens. — Occupying damp 
shady cliffs on both sides of the Rhaidr Falls bounding the counties 
Montgomery and Denbigh, four miles west of Llan-rhaidr, July, 
1882. Quite green; larger in all its parts than the glaucous form 
of S. Forsterianum. This is the same plant as I have in other 
? 
It does not agree in size with the ease of Mr. Bo rrer’s 
rg Gustin Ley. ‘TI think there a eee subspecies of rupestre, 
Viz. . S. pruniatum Brotero — §. elegans Lejeune. 2. . Fors- 
terianum Sm — 8. aureum Wag. Be that this represents the 
latter excellently, .Gck 
Hieracium corr yrbosun Fr. — Cliffs between St. sop: and 
Kinkell Ness, N. H. Fife, 8th August, 1882.—Cuantes B sb. 
The leaves are not so shomboidal in in yours, nor is the corymbous 
character ‘typical.’ The peduncles are larger than usual, and ihe 
