816 NOTICES OF BOOKS. 
- This first recorded Cornish station must be some fifteen miles or so 
from Mr. Husband’s Devon fee (the only one yet Be or 
), and Kilkhampton Road. On the 
following day (Sept. 12th) Mr. Saar prreens "Cicondia Ajo 
from two spots between Pyworthy and North Tamerton, he 
Devon side of the Tamar. In one (a Ste roadside) it extended 
for between twenty and thirty yards; but at the other (on a 
- neighbouring common) it appeared only very ee a was 
not accepted as a Devon plant by Watson, although he it to 
have been vaguely Sua Ane os such in ‘Flora pce and 
elsewhere.—W. Moy. 
Lirarts Lorseii ec h, ae AMBRIDGESHIRE.——['his rare plant, 
which seems to have been ‘overtonked or not recorded from thi 
county since 1868, still grows in some plenty on a moor in Prof. 
Babington’s District 5, Burwell. As patches of from two or three 
seems no danger of its becoming lost to the Cambridgeshire flora 
at present._-AuLrrep F'RyER. 
PoTaMoGETONS NEW TO CamBRIDGE anD Hunts. — Potamogeton 
Zizii M. & K., in abundance in the parishes “of tages and 
Welches Dam, in Cambridgeshire; and by Parsonware Drov 
the parish of Ramsey, Hunts. PP. decipiens Nolte, plentifully in 
Sutton gault to Witcham gravel, in — ; and rarely in the old 
Bedford at Earith, Hunts. —A.rreD Fryz 
NOTICES OF BOOKS. 
The Botanical Record Club, Phanerogamic Report for the Years 
1881 and 1882, by the Referees and Editor. Manchester: 
Printed by James Collins. 1883. Pp. 179-251 
s Report contains, as usual, a large amount t of matter of 
great ‘ian to those who study the geographical distribution of our 
British plants. It contains also critical notes of varying interest 
and importance, for which the Editor, Mr, F. A. Lees, is mainly 
responsible. e have no space for a detailed criticism, but may 
note two or three points in passing. A variety of Veronica Anagallis 
is named glandulosa by Mr. Lees, but seems from his description to 
have slender claims to a distinctive name. A long editorial note 
on Orchis incarnata seems to us likely to add to the misunderstanding 
already existing as to that plant—a misunderstanding which we - 
not think Mr. Clarke fully cleared up, and on which Mr. Corry 
preparing a paper for this Journal at the time of his sel Ee 
decease. We doubt whether the plant so named i in this Report is 
in all cases the true incarnata ; and the date “July 5th” assigned 
to its flowering at Birkdale (Southport) is exceptionally late, it 
