846 SHORT NOTES. 
56. L. C., ed. 5. Berkshire. (No date]. 
Bo 3, d. 8. Near Peterboro’, apbiiees side of Nene. [No 
date] . 
58. ,, ed. 8. Near Peterboro’, Hunts side of Nene. 
ag. 4.) eds I. imley, Staffords ire. 
60. ,, ed. 8. Near Lincoln town 
61. ,, ed. 8. Neighbourhood of Boston, ——— 
62. ,,  ed.8. Thorpe Station, Lincolns hire 
68. ,, ed. 8. Grimsby and Clea, Lincoln = 
64. ,, ed. 8. Neighbourhood of Louth, Laneolialéee: 
65... -.sy:. 60, 4.’ Prestwich. 
66 ed. 3. Mattag near town, 1857. West Lan- 
caster, 1856. 
O67. 42 0.) oe 4. Westmoreland and Kendal. 
.2. Shap, 1857 and 1856, and vicinit : 
Separate srsdieations for Rossgill, Swindale, Shap ‘Abbeys and 
Mardale. 
69. L. C., ed. 4. Shap and vicinity, 1856. 
pve Shap, extending to Orton, Crosley, - Haweswater. 
obs C., ed. * Mardale and hills abov 
»  @d.1. Species observed in Glen Shee, Perthshire, 
4. 
L. ed. 1. Glen Clova [and] Rocks of Canlochan Glen, 
Castletown, &¢., Braemar, 1844. [With in- 
1832]. 
L. C. 
dications of a rp noticed i in 
(To be continued.) 
SHORT NOTES. 
GNAPHALIUM bio1cum In Hants.—I have lately received from the 
Rey. William L. W. Eyre, of Swarraton Rectory, Alresford, speci- 
ich 
yre 
menus of Guaphalium divicum, of wh e informs me he has found 
a considerable patch in the parish of RY and in a situation 
e 
another Species to the Flora of Hampshire, prngag those of = 
TowNnsE 
NECIO viscosus In CamBripeEsHirE ?—In the second edition of 
: Tops aphical Botany’ Senecio viscosus is not admitted as a Cam- 
bridgeshire plant. At page 225 Mr. Watson writes :—“ The mistake 
has been so frequent that I hesitate to enumerate any 0 he 
following counties as certain,” 29 then being given amongst many 
doubtful records. On turning to Professor Babington’s ‘ Flora o 
Cambridgeshire’ the plant in question is found to be inserted 
wholly on the trae of the older botanists—in this instance 
Ray and Relhan only; and at page 315, Appendix No. ix., it is 
included in the list which “ contains the names of those plants 
