A REVISION OF THE ORIENTAL HESPERIID.E. 167 



! Pampiiila SILVIUS. 

 Papilio silvius, Knocli, Beitr. Ins. i. pi. v. figs. 1, 2 (1781) ; Esper, Schmett. i. 2, pi. lxxx. figs. 5, 6 

 (1782) ; Hiibner, Eur. Schmett. i. figs. 477, 478 (1798-1803). 



Hab. N. Europe to Amurland (Graeser). 



! Pamphila houangtt. 

 Carterocephalus houangty, Oberthiir, Etud. d'Ent. xi. p. 27, pi. v. fig. 5 (1886). 

 Pamphila houangty, Leech, Butt. China &c. p. 586 (1893-4). 



Hab. West China, Ta-tsien-lo (Pratt). 

 ! Pamphila pulchra. 



Pamphila pulchra, Leech, Entomologist, xxiv. Suppl. p. 59 (June 1891) ; id. Butt. China &c. 



p. 586, pi. xl. fig. 20, S (1894). 

 Carterocephalus ops, Groum-Grshimailo, Horoe Ent. Soc. Ross. xxv. p. 460 (1891). 



Hab. Ta-tsien-lo, Wa-su-Kow, West China (Pratt) ; N.E. Tibet (Groum-Grshimailo. 

 fide Leech). 



We rely on Mr. Leech's identification of C. ops, which we have not seen. 



! Pamphila avanti. 

 Pamphila avanti, de Nieeville, Jour. As. Soc. Beng. 1886, p. 255, pi. xi. fig. 10, £ ; Watson, Hesp. 

 Ind. p. 159. 



Type in coll. Elwes. 



Hab. Interior of Sikhim, circa 12,000 feet (White). 



! Pamphila argyrostigma. 



Ste?-opes argyrostigma, Eversmann, Bull. Mosc. 1851, i. p. 624 ; Nordmann, 1. c. ii. p. 442, pi. xii. 



figs. 1, 2 (1851). 

 Carterocephalus argyrostigma, Alphtraky, Mem. sur Lep. v. p. 123 (1889). 

 Pamphila argyrostigma, Leech, Butt. China &c. p. 585 (1893-4). 



Hab. Amurland (Eversmann) ; Mongolia (Potanine, fide Alpheraky). 

 ! Pamphila flavomaculatus. 



Carterocephalus flavomaculatus , Oberthiir, Etud. d'Ent. xi. p. 27, pi. ii. fig. 9 (1886). 

 Pamphila flavomacul at a, Leech, Butt. China Sic. p. 587 (1893-4). 



Hab. West China (Pratt) ; E. Tibet (Biet). 



! Pamphila niveomaculatus. (Plate XIX. fig. 23, ? .) 



Carterocephalus niveomaculatus, Oberthiir, Etud. d'Ent. xi. p. 27, pi. ii. fig. 8 (1886). 

 Pamphila niveomaculata, Leech, Butt. China &c. p. 588 (1893-4). 



Hab. Ta-tsien-lo and E. Tibet (Biet) ; Koko-nor, Tibet (in coll. Bothschild). 



The female is not described or figured by M. Oberthiir, though he says that he has both 

 sexes. Two females from Koko-nor in coll. Eothschild differ in having the spots of the 

 upperside yellowish instead of pure white, but we have little doubt thai they are really 

 females of this species. 



z2 



