IN THE PARAGUAYAN LEPIDOSIREN, ETC. 



V. Keferences to previous Literature. 



i. Barkas, J. W. — On the Sphenoid, Cranial Bones, Operculum, and supposed Ear-bones of 

 Ctenodus. Jour. Roy. Soc. New South Wales, 1877, p. 51. 



2. Bischoff, T. H. W. — Lepidosiren paradoxa, anatomisch untersucht und beschrieben. 



Leipzig, 1840. Transl. in Ann. d. Sc. Nat. vol. xiv. 1840, p. 116. 



3. Bridge, T. W. — On the Osteology of Polyodon folium. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. vol. 169, 



1878, p. 683 



4. Brdhl, C. B. — Anfangsgriinde der vergleichenden Anatomie aller Thierklassen. Wien, 1847, 



p. 216, Atlas, tab. xviii. 



5. Burckhardt, R. — Das Centralnervensystem von Protopterus annectens. Berlin, 1892. 



6. Cobbold, T. S. — On the Cranial Bones of Lepidosiren annectens. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 



1862, p. 129. 



7. Dollo, Louis. — Sur la Phylogeuie des Dipneustes. Bull, de la Societe Beige de Ge"ologie, 



torn. ix. 1895, p. 79. 



8. Ehlers, E. — On Lepidosiren paradoxa, Fitzinger, and Lepidosiren arcuata, sp. n., from 



Paraguay. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. xiv. 1894, p. 1. (Translated from the 

 Nachrichten der k. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gbttingen, 1894.) 



9. Fritsch, A. — Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteiue der Permformation Bohmens, Bd. ii. 



Heft 3, p. 56. 

 9 a. Gadow, H. — On the Modifications of the First and Second Visceral Arches, with special 

 reference to the Plomologies of the Auditory Ossicles. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 

 vol. 179 B, 1888, p. 451. 



10. Gegenbaur, C. — Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere. Leipzig, 



1872. 



11. Gunther, A. — Description of Ceratodus, a genus of Ganoid Fishes recently discovered 



in rivers of Queensland, Australia. Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. vol. 161, 1871, 

 p. 511. 



12. Idem.— The Study of Fishes. Edinburgh, 1880. 



13. Humphry, G. M. — The Muscles of Lepidosiren annectens, with the Cranial Nerves. Jour. 



Anat. & Phys. vol. vi. 1872, p. 253. 



14. Huxley, T. H. — Manual of the Anatomy of Vertebrated Animals. London, 1871, pp. 168- 



170. 



15. Idem. — Contributions to Morphology. — Ichthyopsida. No. 1. On Ceratodus fosteri, with 



Observations on the Classification of Fishes. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1876, p. 24. 

 ! 6. Idem. — On the Position of the Anterior Nasal Apertures in Lepidosiren [Protopterus annectens) . 

 Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1876, p. 180. 



17. Idem. — On Menobranchus lateralis. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1874, p. 186. 



18. Hyutl, J. — Lepidosiren paradoxa. Monographie. Abhand. d. Bohm. Gesellsch. Bd.iii. 1845, 



p. 605. 



19. Iversen, M. — Bemerkungen fiber die dorsalen Wurzeln des Nervus hypoglossus. Ber. der 



Naturforsch. Gesellsch. zu Freiburg, i. B. 1893, Bd. vii. Heft 2. 



20. Lankester, E. Ray. — On the Lepidosiren of Paraguay and on the External Characters of 



Lepidosiren and Protopterus. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. vol. xiv. pt. i. 1896, p. 11. 

 vol. xiv. — part v. No. 7. — February, 1898. 3 c 



