﻿332 



4. A. lunata. — Eulophia lunata, Schlechter, in AbhandL Bot. 

 T creins Prov. Brand., xxxv, p. 45. 



5. A. lamellata. — Eulophia lamellata, Lindley, Gen. <& Sp. Orch., 

 p. 184; Bolus, (hxh. Cape Penin*., tab. 22, figs. 4-7, anal. 



6. A. micbantha. — Eulophia micrantha, Lindley. Gen. d Sp. Orch. 

 p. 184; Bolus, Icon. Orch. Au.tr. Afr., t. 4. 



7. A. cochlearis.— Eitf-phia r- .<•/(/. v<m, Lindley, in Comp. Bot. 

 Mag., ii, p. 202, not of Steudel ; Bolus, Icon. CW*. Austr. Afr., t, 5. 



8. A. ustulata. ' Bolus, in Aoum. Linn. 

 Soc. {Bot.), xx, p. 469 ; Eulophia ustulata, ib., Orch. Cape Penins., 

 p. 110, t. 2. 



Key to the Species. 

 § 1. Euacrolophia. — Anther 2-horned; flowers spurred or saccate. 



Bracts coloured 1. A. comosa. 



„ not coloured. 



Capsule spherical 2. A. sph^roc^rpa. 



m ovoid or oblong. 

 Flowers 1-1-2 cm. long .... 8. A. tristis. 

 1-4-1-6 cm. long. 

 Column narrowed to the apex . 4. A. lunata. 

 „ widened „ „ . 5. A. lamellata. 

 § 2. Acrolophiella.— Anther without horns; flowers spurred or saccate. 



„ nearly square 7 



-Anther without horns ; flowers without spu 



BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 

 VII.— Wouam Young and his Work. 



a T A HE ^ rodu ? r ion of livin g specimens of Dionma to England is 

 due to William Young, of Philadelphia. The plant seems to have 

 been discovered by Arthur Dobbs, Governor of North Carolina, who 

 '; to Peter Collinson in a letter dated at Bruns- 



wick, Jan. 24, 

 John Bartram, who in 1765 s 



ubsequently received it from 



\v;ntl i e JL° u! nn ^ S ( dat ^ Sept. 23, 1769) is well known 



„ Street and Mile End, and 

 Holborn":| "a large cargo" of the plant i 

 received by Gordon in 1769. § 



ion«a criritT C ' imm ° f PlaQt ' lQ MS Ascription Solander 

 J Ellis in Correspondence ofLinnaus, ii. 73. § Op. cit. i. 248. 



