﻿Vol. 66.] 



LJ1IESTOXE SOtJTTT OF THE CEAVEIST FAELT. 



o5» 



The fossils here are again quite indistinguishable from the 

 Elbolton and Swinden fossils. Except that I have not been able to 



"S 



»5 © 



« g 



V&» 



$ 5 



obtain from a comparatively small cutting the same extensive list 

 as I have obtained from the large knolls, there is no difference 

 whatever to be recorded. 



