Vol. 55.] NEAE MELMEEBT (cUMBEELAND). 15 



times had been adduced, and remarked on the great strength of the 

 body of evidence laid before the Society on that occasion. 



The Eev. J. E. Blake said that the Author seemed to have a 

 theory that the surface-features of the stones he exhibited were due, 

 not to glacial action, but to earth-movements. This theory would 

 be more easily accepted if the Author could state in what direction 

 the movement was supposed to have taken place, what relation it 

 had to the direction of the markings on the stones, and what evi- 

 dence there was in the neighbourhood of movement having taken 

 place in that direction. 



The Peesident, Prof. H. G. Seeley, and Mr. E. J. Gaewood also 



The AuTHOE, in reply, stated that he had brought the case forward 

 simply as an example to which appeal might be made in future 

 discussions, as showing exceptionally good indications of the various 

 features produced by slickensiding. 



