﻿L. hybri 



With. Bot. i 



vvim. .DOE. AIT. ea. 3, (I7yt>). 166t 



Garden near Goring-house."— Merrett, 69. 



L. purpureum L. Sp. PI. 579 (1753). 1548. " Red Arch- 

 aungel . . . groweth in hedges."— Turn. Names, D ij, back. 



L. album L. Sp. PI. 579 (1753). 1548. "Dead nettle or 

 whyte nettle .... groweth comoly in hedges."— Turn. Names, 

 D vij, back. 



L. Galeobdolon Crantz, Fl. Austr. ii. 262 (1763). 1597. 

 " I have found it under the hedge on the left hand as you go from 

 the village of Hampsteed neere London to the church, and in the 

 wood thereby," &c— Ger. 568. 



Ballota nigra L. Sp. PI. 582 (1753). 1548. " Groweth in 

 hedges eommunely in every countrey."— Turn. Names, B iiij, back. 



Teucrium Botrys L. Sp. PI. 562 (1753). 1844. Discovered 

 by Thos. Ingall and Wm. Bennett " in a wild stony locality .... 

 at the back of Box Hill in Surrey," 17 Aug. 1844.— Phytol. i. 1086. 



T. Scordium L. Sp. PI. 565 (1753). 1548. " I heare say 

 that it groweth . . . besyde Oxforde."— Turn. Names, G j, back. 

 " In Oxfordshyre and in Cambridgeshyre in good plenty." — Torn. 

 Herb. ii. 131 (1562). 



T. Scorodonia L. Sp. PI. 564 (1753). 1570. "In sylvis 

 Angliae."— Lob. Adv. 210. 



Ajuga reptans L. Sp. PI. 561 (1753). 1548. " Groweth in 

 shaddowy places and moyst groundes."— Turn. Names, H. ij (" Con- 

 sohda media "). 



A. pyramidalis L. Sp. PI. 561 (1753). 1777. " I am 

 assured by the Be v. Doctor Burgess, of Kirkmichael, that it is a 

 native of Scotland, but I have not yet learned the particular place 

 of its growth.*'— Lightfoot, Fl. Scot. 303. See With. Bot. Arr. 

 ed. 3, 516 (1796). 



A. Chamajpitys Schreb. PI. Vertical. Unilab. 24 (1773). 1551. 

 " It groweth ... in good plenty in Kent."— Turn. i. 53 (182). 



Canadian Potamogetons sent me a few years ago by Prof. Macoun, 

 of Ottawa, was one named " P. pmlongus Wulf., Sicamore, B. Co- 

 lumbia." This I at first placed with pralongus, but later put it 

 among perfoliatus ; not satisfied with that, I put it by itself, with a 

 'query as to its suggested origin. To ordinary perfoliatus it bears 

 little resemblance, except in the leaf-bases; but to the var. Richard- 

 sonii Ar. Benn. (v. lanceolatus Bobbins, non Blytt) it comes very 

 near in habit, but its peduncles are those of pmlongus. In con- 

 sidering pralongus as one of its parents, the period of flowering has 

 to be taken into account ; but I have gathered perfoliatus in full 

 flower the first week in June, in Norfolk, and a day later seen 

 prmlongm in flower, though not associated with the former. Dr. 



(To be « 



SHORT NOTES. 



