LIST OF BRITISH AND IRISH RUBI. 168 
6. R. Lixpteyanus Lees.— : Shrewsbury (labelled “R. 
leucostachys”’ by Lindley, 1837 ; iat. Babington Brit. Rubi, ed. i. 
p. 77). 
7. R. nwamnirotrus Wh. et N.—The ordinary British form. 
Engl.: Rydal, Westmorel. JIrel.: between Belfast and Holly- 
wood ; Magilligan, Derry; above Lough Inagh, Connemara, 
mare 
ENTERI Marss. (R. umbrosus of Brit. aati Engl. : 
Rydal, an orale Trel.: Colin shies near Belfas 
. Rusticanus Merc.—-(R. discolor of Brit. Say Engl. : 
Shrewabary (labelled * R. pckocfolns ’ by Lindley, 1837). Irel.: 
between Samer: and Hollywood; between "Kingstawl and Dublin ; 
Co. Wicklow ; Co. Derry ; Co. Galway. 
10. R. awextricatus Lees. —Engl.: Twycross, Leicest. (Bloxam). 
11. R. Sprenceto Wh. a Deeks Hill, Leicest. (Bloxam). 
12. R. napuna Wh.—Fenl. : Twycross, Leicest. (Bloxam). 
13. R. ecuratrus Lindl. (R. rudis Babingt. prius). — Engl. : 
Almond Park, near Shrewsbury (labelled * R. rudis” by Lindley, 
18387). 
14, R. rorsosus Wh. et N., var. saltwum Focke (the form of 
(Baran or granitic soil).— Engl. : Hartshill Wood, Warwicksh. 
Bloa 
15. R. rosaceus Wh. et N.—Jrel.: Cave Hill, near Belfast. 
A poor dwarf specimen, o only a eee high. The determi- 
16. R. Kozntert Wh. et N.—Engl.: Wych, Gloucest. ; Rydal, 
Westmorel. * Two specimens from Rydal seem to be inte rmediate 
between oehleri and R. rhamnifolius. I suspect they may be 
hybrids, although they bear some perfect fruits. 
flowers are rset only a few carpels. 
. R. prversirouius Lindl. — Engl.: near Ashby-de-la-Zouch 
(Blozam). 
. Batrourianus — Engl.: Between Atcham and 
Reston Boats, near rete (labelled R. ‘‘ afinis? or plicatus ?”’ 
by Leet 1837). 
19. COR s Sm Engl.: near Marsden, Durham ; 
Cheshire ; Westmoreland. Trak: Co. Derr 
0. B.c s L.— : Richmond, near London ; near Cam- 
bridge ; Shre sie ang o Kendal, Lara Trel. : Co. Wicklow ; 
banks of L. Erne; banks of L. Carr: 
BR. casts x Inzus —Engl. : Panes Scar, near Kendal, 
Westmoreland. 
I have omitted in this enumeration some doubtful forms repre- 
sented only by small bits, which cannot be exactly determinated. 
Two or shies imperfect Irish specimens, however, look very 
curious, and seem to be different from all known English forms. 
* This I believe to be identical with the plant described by co as Rubus 
grandulosus, of which there is a full account on page 208 Babington’s 
Synopsis. It was originally ealeied at Rydal by Turner, and ri ve gathered 
it myself in the same neighbourhood._J. G. B 
u 2 
