196 CATALOGUE OF MOTHS, 



Durham I only have the " Manual" record that it has occurred 

 at Darlington, and that Mr. Gardner has taken it at Black 

 Halls. Mr. Sang does not appear to have met vs^ith it either 

 about Darlington or elsewhere. 



256. C. troglodytella, Dup. 



Coleophora troglodytella. Staint. Man., vol. ii., p. 391. 

 ,, „ Meyr. Hdbk. Brit. Lep., p. 656. 



Meyrick limits the recorded northward range of this species 

 to York, but it has occurred at Darlington, where Mr. Sang took 

 it, and in Crimdon Cut, where Mr. Gardner met with it. 



257. G. lineolea, Haw. 



Coleophora lineolea. Staint. Man., vol. ii., p. 391. 



,, ,, Meyr. Hdbk. Brit. Lep., p. 655. 



A local species, but very widely distributed. I have no 

 other knowledge of its occurrence here than the "Manual" 

 record, which gives it as occurring at Newcastle-on-Tyne. As 

 already said, the Newcastle list was supplied by AVailes, who 

 collected in both counties. Here is another enigma for our 

 Newcastle collectors to solve. 



258. C. apicella, Stain. 



Coleophora apicella. Staint. Man., vol. ii,, p. 391. 

 ,, ,, Meyr. Hdbk. Brit. Lep., p. 655. 



Rather a local species, and not extending very far north. It 

 is not given in Porritt's Yorkshire catalogue, but Mr. Sang took 

 it at Bay dales, near Darlington, many years ago. Its redis- 

 covery would be important. This is the cacuminatella of 

 Doubleday's list. 



269. C. annulatella, Tengst. 



Coleophora annulatella. Staint. Man., vol. ii., p. 392. 

 ,, laripetmella. Meyr. Hdbk. Brit. Lep., p. 657. 



This, which is rather a common species, and was called 

 tengstromella \)j Doubleday, is given in the "Manual" as 



