268 CATALOGUE OF MOTHS. 



Page 62. 



Halonota trigeminana. 



I took a few specimens of this insect at Egglestone in 

 Teesdale early in June, 1911, but it was decidedly scarce. 



Page 65. 



Halonota tnrbidana. 



Since Mr. Robson's notes were written I have taken 

 tu7'bida7ia every season at Greatham in fair numbers, and last 

 year, 1911, Mr. Corder and I found the larva (which was 

 hitherto unknown) feeding on the roots of Petasites and bred 

 the moth (see Ent. Mo. Mag. for May, 1911, p. 111-112, and 

 August, 1911, p. 192). 



Page 66. 



Dichrorampha politana. 



My records were for Sericoris politana and not this species, 

 which I have never met with. 



Pages 66 and 67. 



Dichrorampha herbosana. 



Mr. Bankes writes " I greatly regret that I cannot subscribe 

 to your concluding remark that tanaceti, Stn., is certainly not 

 identical with herhosana, Brt. Mr. Durrant, Lord Walsing- 

 ham's curator, a very able micro-lepidopterist, worked out very 

 carefully, with the help of all Lord Walsingham's and my own 

 material, the synonymy of the genus Dichrorampha and offered 

 his conclusions to Meyrick who accepted them ; the only help 

 he accepted (he asked for none). I believe all Durrani's con- 

 clusions and synonymy to be quite correct, and that herbosana 

 must sink as identical with tanaceti, Stu. Sang himself sent 

 me specimens as " tanaceti (herbosana).'^ In Ent. Mo. Mag., 

 xxii., p. 1, and xxiii., p. 1, Barrett readily admits that 

 Warren's conclusion (given in E.M.M., xxi., p. 190) that 

 herbosa7ia, Brt., is identical with tanaceti, Stn., Wilk., is 

 correct." 



