1882.] animals of various Indian Land Ilollusca (Pulmouifera). 71 



EuPLECTA ? CAMURA. Plate V, fig. 5. 

 (Not named) [" Darjiling, Stol."J fig. 49 of MSS. Drawings. 



In pencil by Nevill. " 1 think iV". camura.'" 



In Nevill's Handlist, (^1878) p 30, No. 95. Nanina camura, Benson. 

 " Animal asliy-grey, no projecting lobe above the caudal gland ; sole doubly 

 **and broadly margined. This mollusk precisely resembles N. indica, to 

 which it is evidently closely allied" [W. T. B.] 15, Darjiling, coll. Dr. F. 

 Stoliczka and Col. G. Mainwaring. 



" 1. Darjiling 7000 ft. Dr. F. Stoliczka. 



" In a drawing which I take to be of this species there is a pointed horn- 

 " like projection on the lobe above the mucous gland not so large, however, 

 " as in JV. tugurium ; the tail is also more abruptly truncated." This last 

 description no doubt refers to this drawing fig 49, and William Blanford's 

 description from life does not at all agree as regards the horn above the 

 mucous gland, and we therefore cannot be at all certain what species has 

 been drawn. 



EuPLECTA ? CEOSSEi, Pfr. Plate V, fig. 10. 

 [No Genus, " Crossei, Singapur," Stol.] Fig. 34 of MSS. Drawings. 



Nevill's description of animal is probably taken from this drawing. 

 Handlist (1878) p. 32, No. Ill, as Naniiia crossei, Pfr. 



" Tail abruptly truncate, gland relatively rather small, surrounded 

 " with a broad swollen margin ; it is evidently congeneric with JSf. ligu- 

 " lata, the animal of which it closely resembles," 20 sp. from Sinkip Island 

 ex. col. J. Wood-Mason, 20 sp. " Singapur, coll. Dr. F. Stoliczka." 



EuPLECTA ? Plate V, fig. 7. 

 \Tedina but query. Bombay (Stol).] Fig. 31 of MSS. Drawings. 

 Etjplecta ? Species unknown. Plate V, fig. 9. 

 [Kandale, Stol.] Fig. 18 of MSS. Drawings. 



Is this Khandala, Bombay ? This carefully executed drawing repre- 

 sents a very remarkable species. The very yellow colouring being character- 

 istic and the mucous gland peculiar in form, there being scarcely any over- 

 hanging lobe. It may be related to pedina, if from the Bombay side. 



EXPLANATION OF PLATE. 



Fig 1. Oxytes hlanfordi, Theobald. 



2. Bo, koondaensis, W. Blf. 



3. Rotula maimoaringi, G. Nevill MS. 



4. Macrochlamys tugurium, Benson. 



5. Euplecia camura, Benson, 



6. Rhgssota conferta, Pfr. 



7. EupUcta ? pedina. 



