1886.] Lepidoptera of Cachar. 361 



Two males, Irangmara, 2nd and 3rd, one female, Irangmara, 13th 

 August, and another, Durgakuna, 28th April. The female of this 

 species* not having been figured from a typical specimen by Mr. Moore, 

 is refigured here. 



87. EUTHALIA KESAVA. 



Adolias Tcesava, Moore, Trans. Ent. Soo. Lond., new series, vol. v, p. 67, n. 9, 

 pi. iii, fig. 5, male and female (1859) ; Euthalia phemius, Staudinger, Ex. Schmett., 

 pi. liv, ? only (1885). 



Two males and two females between 18th Jnly and 10th August in 

 forests around Silcuri. 



88. Euthalia garuda. 



Adolias garuda, Moore, Horsfield and Moore, Cat. Lep. Mus. E. I. C, vol. i, 

 p. 186, n. 374, pi. vi, figs. 2, larva ; 2a, pupa (1857). 



Sixty-two males and twenty females in forests around Silcuri be- 

 tween 29th May and 12th August. 



89. Euthalia phemius. 



Itanus phemius, Doubleday and Hewitson, Gen. Diurn. Lep., vol. ii, pi. xli, fig. 4, 

 male (1850); Adolias sancara, Moore, Horsfield and Moore, Cat. Lep. Mus. E. I. C. 

 vol. i, p. 195, n. 394, female (1857) ; Euthalia phemius, Staudinger, Ex. Schmett. 

 pi. liv, S only (1885). 



One female, Irangmara, 8th August. Mr. Moore continues to con- 

 sider JEJ. phemius and E. sancara as distinct species, though every one we 

 have met who knows these insects in the field unhesitatingly places the 

 two together under the former name as the opposite sexes of one. He 

 admits, however, that the specimens he had described as the opposite 

 sexes of his species were both of the female sex. The two were united 

 as the opposite sexes of one species on structural grounds alone in 1881 

 by Mr. Wood-Mason, whose conclusion was subsequently confirmed by 

 the field observations of Mr. de Niceville and others. 



90. Euthalia jama, PI. XVI, Figs. 4, a' ; 3, $ . 



Adolias jama, Felder, Reise Novara, Lep., vol. iii, p. 431, n. 690 (1867). 



A single female was obtained on Nemotha on 12th September, and 

 is here figured. At the same time we have figured a male specimen 

 from the Naga Hills in the collection of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. 



It has nothing whatever to do with either sex of the Euthalia 

 described and figured by Mr. Distant under the same name (Rhop. 

 Malay., p. 119, n. 4, pis. xiv, fig. 8, $ ; xv, fig. 4, ? (1883). 



* A. jahnu, Moore, Trans. Ent. See. Lend., new series, vol. v, p. 74, n. 24 

 pi. vii, fig. 1, female (1859). 



