List ot Victorian Eucalypts. 81 



50. E. RUBiDA, Deane and Maiden, 



See C.R., Part. XXVL, p. 110, Plates 109-111 (1916). Also 

 F.F., Part LXIIL, p. 87, Plate 237 (1920). I concur in Mr. 

 Baker's view that this is E. viminalis variety (b) of Howitt, but 

 lie has overlooked my same record in Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 

 XXVL, 578 (1901), 12 years earlier. 



51. E. siDERoxYLON, A. Cunn. 



See C.R., Part XII., p. 82, Plate 55 (1910) ; F.F., Part XIIL, 

 p. 70, Plate 49 (1904). 



52. E. SlEBERIANA, F.V.M. 



See C.R., Part X., p. 306, with Plate 45 (1908); also F.F., 

 Part XXXIV., p. 49, Plate 128 (1909). As regards the con- 

 fusion with E. virgata, Sieb., see p. 82 below. 



53. E. Smithii, R. T. Baker. 



See C.R., XII., p. 76, Plate 55 (1910), but without a Victorian 

 locality. 



54. E. STELLULATA, Sieb. 



See C.R., Part V., p. 127, Plate 25 (1904) ; F.F., Part XIV., 

 p. 94, Plate 54 (1905). 



55. E. Stuartiana, F.v.M. 



In C.R., Part XXL, pp. 4 and 6, I have explained that Mueller 

 mixed up his Stuartiana very much, including no less than three 

 distinct species under that name. E. Bridgesiana, R. T. Baker, 

 is the third of these three, and I have pointed out {op. cit., 

 XXIV., p. 68) that the description of a species under another 

 name does not remove the difficulties. 



E. Stuartiana (E. Bridgesiana) is described at Part XXIV., 

 p. 68, and Plates 101 and 102 (1915). Victorian localities at p. 

 69. 



E. Stuartiana, F.v.M., as understood by Mr. Baker, is synony- 

 mous with E. cinerea, F.v.M. See my C.R., Part XXL, pp. 1 

 and 2, and Plate 89. 



As regards E. Stuartiana, F.v.M., var. cordata, Baker and 

 Smith, see my C.R., Part XXL, p. 5 (1914), where I state that 

 it is synonymous with E. cinerea, F.v.M. (var. multiflora. 

 Maiden). See Part XXL, p. 7, Plates 89 and 90. 



