82 /. H, Maiden: 



56. E. TERETICORNIS, Sm. 



See C.R., Part XXXL, p. 5, Plate 128 (1917). 



57. E. TRANScoNTiNENTALis, Maiden. 



As to Victorian localities, see C.R., Part XXXIX., p. 270 

 (1919) with the localities indicated at Part XV., p. 171. 



58. E. UNCINATA, Turcz. 

 See C.R., Part XIV., p. 143, Plate 62 (1912). 



59. E. viMiNALis, Labill. 



See C.R., Part XXVIII., p. 167, Plates 117-119 (1916). 



E. viMiNALis, var. pluriflora, J.H.M. (Maiden). 

 Although I cannot trace this reputed variety attributed to me 

 at the moment of writing, attention may be invited to my note 

 of another variety, viz., racemosa, F.v.M., in Proc. Roy. Soc. Tas., 

 p. 90 (1918). The type appears to have come from Port Phillip, 

 and I have given a number of Victorian localities in Part 64- 

 of F.F. 



60. E. viRGATA, Sieb. 



Synonymous with E. Luehmanniana, F.v.M. For a history^ 

 of the confusion of this shrub (or very small tree) with £. 

 Sieheriana, F.v.M., see C.R., Part XXXIX., p. 283 (1919) ; with- 

 C.R., Part IX., figs. 1 and 2, Plate 43; also Plate 44 (as £. 

 Luehmanniana) . 



61. E. viRiDis^ R. T. Baker. 



This will be found figured and described as E. acacioides, A. 

 Cunn., in C.R., XL, 45, figs. 9-12, Plate 52 (1910), and in my 

 F.F., Part XLVIIL, Plate 180 (whole plate), but I have since 

 satisfied myself that Cunningham's material is mixed. 



62. E. viTREA, R. T. Baker. 



See C.R., Part VI., pp. 150 and 164, and Part VII., p. 189, 

 with Plate 34 (1905); F.F., Part XXIII., p. 39, with Plate 86- 

 (1906). See also Journ. Roy. Soc. N.S.W., LIL, 516 (1918), 

 in which I try to clear up its relations to E. vitellina, Naudin. 



For notes on Victorian localities see a paper by myself in:. 

 Jotirn. Roy. Soc. N.S.W., LIL, 517 (1918). 



