List of Victorian Eucalypts. 85 



Excluded Species. 



In some cases it may be almost confidently predicted that they 

 will be found to occur in Victoria, but it is best, in a list like 

 this, to admit none without absolute proof. 



E. AMYGDALINA, Labill. 



. See C.R., Part XXXVIIL, p. 227 (1919), where I agree with 

 Messrs. Baker and Smith that the original species appears tO' 

 be confined to Tasmania. At the same time it should be looked 

 for on the Victorian coast. For the E. amygdalina as understood 

 by Bentham, Mueller, and other botanists, see C.R., Part VI. 



E. CAPITELLATA, Sm. 



For many years I concurred in the general opinion that this 

 species, originally described from Port Jackson, extended to- 

 Victoria. See my C.R., Part VIIL, p. 211, with Plate Z7, in part 

 (1907). I am now of opinion, as expressed in Part XLV.,p. 117, 

 that it does not extend to Victoria,and that some of the Victorian 

 specimens are referable to E. Blaxlandi, Maiden and Cambage,. 

 Journ. Roy. Sac. NSW., LIL, 495 (1918). 



E. DEALBATA, A. CunU. 



See C.R., Part XXXIL, p. 48, Plates 134, 135 (1917). At 

 p. 49 I have stated that it has been recorded from Albury, but 

 the specimens are not quite satisfactory, nor are the Tumbar- 

 umba ones normal. Although these localities (especially the 

 former) are close to Victoria, they make one pause before in- 

 ferring that, on this evidence, the species occurs in Victoria. 

 Professor Ewart tells me that he cannot find any trace of this 

 specimen (quoted by Mr. Baker; C. Walter was an old collector 

 of Mueller's); "all our records for dealbata are from New 

 South Wales localities only." I cannot therefore accept it as a 

 Victorian plant at present. 



E. FASCICULOSA, F.V.M. 



The history of the confusion of this species with E. paniculata, 

 Sm., is given at C.R., Part XIV. p. 140, with Plate 61 (1912). 

 It is not a Victorian plant, so far as we know. 



E. paniculata, Sm., is not a Victorian plant, in spite of my 

 reference to it in C.R., XIII., 106, following Mueller. Mueller's- 



