84 J. H. Maiden : List oj Victorian Eucalypts. 



record is from Gippsland, a very unlikely locality for E. fascicu- 

 losa, F.V.M., which see. 



Those who desire to see a figure of this species will find it in 

 F.F., Part VIIL, Plate 30 (1904). 



E. HAEMASTOMA, Sm. 



I do not know of a Victorian locality. 



E. PIPERITA, Sm. 



See C.R., Part X., p. 299, Plate 45 (1908). As regards its 

 claim to be a Victorian species, see pp. 300, 302, 304. I think 

 it is a doubtful Victorian plant at present. See also F.F., Part 

 XXXIII., p. 38, Plate 124 (1909). 



E. popuLiFOLiA, Hook. 



An excellent Victorian Eucalyptus observer, Mr. Harry Hop- 

 kins, says in "Advance Australia," for October, 1909: "An- 

 other species not common in Victoria, but which extends east- 

 ward through New South Wales and to Queensland, according 

 to von Mueller, is Eucalyptus populifolia — the poplar-leaved or 

 shining box tree. I have not seen it west of the Tambo River." 

 He has sent me specimens from Orbost and the Tambo River, 

 whose foliage simulates that of E. Bauer iana a good deal. Al- 

 though I reject it as a Victorian plant on the evidence, I some- 

 what confidently look forward to its collection in the Mallee 

 ■country, or north-west. 



For a figure of E. populifolia see my F.F., Part XLVII., Plate 

 176 (1912). 



E. STRiCTA, Sieb. 



See C.R., Part XL., p. 336 (1920). It has not been proved 

 to be a Victorian species so far. 



E. WooLLSiANA, R. T. Baker. 



The Seymour plant is, I am satisfied, E. hemiphloia, var. micro- 

 ■carpa. As I am of opinion, already expressed in C.R., Part XL, 

 xmder E. odorata and E. hemiphloia, that E. Woollsiana is a mix- 

 ture of species, and as a full explanation requires additional 

 figures, it cannot be fully dealt with at this place. It will be 

 -dealt with in Part XLVIL, C.R. 



