﻿187 i.] ofilw Burmese 'Flora. 87 



soutliern slopes of the Pegu Yomah above Rangoon ; also Tenasserim. 

 Fr. Begin of E. S. 



The Burmese plants differ, as it seems constantly, in having the stigma 

 6-lobed and the ovaries 6-celled. 



4. Gr. ANOMALA, PI. and Trian. in Ann. d. sc. nat. Bot. ser. 4. XIV. 

 329 ; Hf. Ind. PL 1. 266. 



Hab. Not nncommon in the damp and dry hill-forests of Martaban 

 E. of Tounghoo, at elevations from 4000 to 6000 ft, Fl. probably Apr. 

 (buds in March). 



5. G. MEEauENSis, Wight 111, 122 and Ic. t. 116 ; Hf. Ind. FL I. 

 267. 



Hab. Tenasserim, Mergui (Griff.) 



6. G. cowA, Roxb. Fl. Ind. II. 622. {G, Boxhurghii, Wight Ic. 

 t. 104). 



Hab. Chittagong (Roxb.) 



7. G. Ktdia, Roxb. FL Ind. II. 623 ; Wight Ic. t. 118. {G. sp. 

 Griff. Not. Dicot. 609. t. 585. A. f. 12 ?). 



Hab. Frequent in the moister upper mixed and in the tropical forests 

 all over Burmah, from Chittagong, Pegu and Martaban down to Tenasserim 

 and the Andamans. Fl. March to May ; Fr. May June, 



G. lohidosa, Wall. Cat. 4868 from Amherst is G. Ki/dia, the Singa- 

 pore specimen is quite different but too incomplete for identification. 



The Andamanese specimens called in my And. Report G. purpurea, 

 will probably turn out to be the same as the Singapore plant, but tliey are 

 too badly preserved to enable me to give a definite opinion . 



8. G. LANCEJ3F0LIA, Roxb. Fl. Ind. II. 623 j Wight Ic. 163; Hf. 

 Ind. Fl. I. 263. 



Hab. Chittagong hills. 



9. G. succiFOLiA, Kurz in Journ. As. Soc. Beng. 1S72. 293. {G. 

 loniceroides, T. And. in Hf. Ind. Fl. I. 264). 



Hab. Frequent in the swamp forests of the alluvial lands of the 

 Sittang and Irrawaddi rivers. Fl. Apr. 



10. G. ELLIPTICA, Wall. Cat. 4869 ; Wight 111. I. 126 and Icon. t. 

 120. (Garcinia Jieterandra, Wall. Cat. 4856 ; Hf. Ind. Fl. I. 265). 



Hab. Frequent in the tropical forests of the eastern slopes of the Pegu 

 Yomah and Martaban down to Tenasserim, up to 3000 ft. elevation. Fr. 

 Febr. March. 



I consider G. elliptiea, Wall. Cat. 4869 from Silhet identical with the 

 G. Jieterandra of the same author, but other specimens distributed from the 

 Kew Herbarium look different ; iu any case it cannot go into G. Morella. 

 From the contradictory statements of authors with regard to Wallich's 

 species, one is tempted to believe that much confusion must have occurred 



