312 L. de Niceville — On a small collection of [No. 2, 



equal-sized and rather large ocelli. One female has on the underside 

 of the forewing at the apex one medium-sized ocellus, in the other 

 specimen it is wanting; the hindwing has the ocelli as in the male, 

 except that the one in the discoidal interspace is wanting in one specimen, 

 and in the other that that ocellus and the one in the lower subcostal 

 interspace also is absent. 



Subfamily Elymniinjj. 



28. Elymnias (Byctis) viminAlis, Wallace. 

 Originally described from Bouru. 



Subfamily Nymphalin£}. 



29. Cupha lampetia, Linnaeus. 

 Both sexes received. 



80. Atella egtsta, Cramer. 

 Recorded from Bouru by Wallace. 



31. Cynthia arsinoe, Cramer. 

 Males only received. 



32. Precis hedonia, Linnaeus. 



A single very brightly-marked male received, with all the ocelli 

 Jarge and conspicuous, as in Blanchard's figure of " Vanessa hedonia, 

 Fabricius," from Banda, in the Voy. Pole Sud, pi. ii, fig. 10 (1853). 



33. Junonia erigonEj Cramer. 



Males only. Cramer's figure of thia species with its bright red 

 markings on the npperside is very bad. 



34. Neptis (Phaedyma) heliodora, Cramer. 



" Papilio " heliodora is the type of Felder's genus Phaedyma. My 

 single female from Buru has the inner edge of the discal white band 

 on the underside of the hindwing quite straight and even, while 

 Cramer's figure of the species, probably also taken from a female, 

 shews the band highly irregular and uneven. Unfortunately I have no 

 specimens from Amboyna, from whence P. heliodora was described, 

 to compare with my Buru example. Mr. W. t\ Kirby in the Supplement 

 tohisSyn.Cat.Diurn.Lep.,p. 742, n. 30 (1877), gives N. heliodora 

 as a synonym of "Papilio " pellueidus, Goeze, but both species were 

 described in the same year (1779), and as Cramer figured his species. 



