166 Gr. Nevill — New or little-Mown [No. 3, 



so accurately pointed out by Professor von Martens, is still more promi- 

 nent in the Australian species. Another close ally is the Amphithalmus 

 pupoides, H. Adams, P. Z. S., 1865, from Lord Hood's Island, my late 

 much regretted friend in his description also remarks on the resemblance 

 to StenotJiyra. Our Museum possesses specimens of this last, also of A. 

 ohesus, H. Adams, I. c. t and of the type species, A. inclusus, described by 

 Carpenter in the Annals and Mag. XV, 1865, from California. 



EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 



Plate V. 

 Fig. 1. Margarya melanioides, Nev., p. 155. 

 Fig. 2. Paludomus andersoniana, Nev., p. 160. 

 Fig. 3. Paludomus blanfordiana, Nev., p. 159. 

 Fig. 4. Paludomus burmanica, Nev., p. 160. 

 Fig. 5. Paludomus petrosa, Gld., p. 159. 

 Fig. 6. Larina cineta, Ner., p. 161. 



Fig. 7. Plecotrema rapax, Dohrn, var. producta, Nev., p. 155, 

 Fig. 8. Limncea yunnanensis, Nev., p. 142. 

 Fig. 9. Limncea andersoniana, Nev., p. 142. 

 Fig. 10. Suceinea yarJcandensis, Nev., p. 144. 

 Fig. 11. Stenogyra [Glessula] oreas, Bens., p. 135. 

 Fig. 12. Stenogyra [Glessula] blanfordiana, Nev., p. 138. 

 Fig. 13. Stenogyra [Glessula] subfusiformis, W. T. Blf., p. 13ft. 

 Fig. 14. Stenogyra [Glessula] jerdoni, Bens., p. 136. 

 Fig. 15. Stenogyra [Glessula] nilagiriea, Bens., p. 136. 

 Fig. 16a et b. Stenogyra [Glessula] bensoniana, Pfr., p. 137. 

 Fig. 17« et b. Stenogyra [Glessula] per&tteti, Pfr., p. 137. 

 Fig. 18a et b. Stenogyra [Glessula] f acuta, Bens., p. 137. 

 Fig. 19. Stenogyra [Glessula] orophila, Bens., p. 137. 

 Fig. 20. Stenogyra [Glessula] amentum, Bens., p. 138. 

 Fig. 21. Helix [JSgista] perplanata, Nev., p. 133. 

 Fig. 22. Trochomorpha percompressa, W. T. Blf., p. 133. 

 Fig. 23. Helicarion [Austenia] magnifieus, G.-A. & Nev., p. 129. 

 Fig. 24. Helicarim [Austenia] resplendens t Nev., p. 129. 



Plate VI. 



Fig. 1. Gibbus dupontianus, Nev., p. 139. 



Fig. 2. Buliminus [Cerastus] jickelianus, Nev., p. 135. 



Fig. 3. Cyelophorus pealianus, n. sp., p. 146. 

 The apical 2\ whorls are incorrectly represented in the figure. 



Fig. 4. Cyelophorus orites, n. sp., p. 147. 

 The left-hand figure is by no means good ; the last whorl is not contorted. 



