52 ‘ HOOKERA V. BRODIMA. 
his memory is associated by artists with the colour called after 
and there was a peculiar fitness in the 
‘“‘Ord’s Apple,” mentions him as knowing apples ‘better than 
oy Bll || He lived in London, and died about the early part 
of 1852. 
Salisbury finds another ground of complaint** in the substitution 
by Robert Brown of Thysanotus for his Chlamysporum. There cat 
be no question as to the priority of Salisbury’s name, for Brown 
when establishing his Thysanotus quotes “ Chlamysporum Salisb. 
Parad. 103” asasynonym. Brown (Prodr. 282) justifies his conduet 
by saying, ‘‘ Nomen meum, in Herbario Banksiano receptum et D. 
i : i in publica luce 
: 
: 
pi 
es 
4 
4 
.. 
ms 
of his bad Latin, this assertion as fa neern: 
Ise; but I certainly should have opposed his selfish desires to 
taboo that New and genus, even if 
usually known as Thysanotus junceus Brown; and the other species 
* ‘Pomona Herefordiensis,’ viii. + Trans. Hort. Soe. i. 198. c. 
; Salisb.Gen.p.10. _§ Trans. Hort. Soc. ii.62. || Ib. 287. J Ib. 2nd S. i. 246 
+ - Hort. Soe. ii. 62. , 287. ' 
William Hooker was “a 4 ily the same 
Fe son’s ‘Hist. of Engli 
ening, Fae gn the ‘Pomona Londinensis’ is attributed to Sir ( 
ooker. 2 
*“* Whether Salisbury’s personal unpopularity had anything to do with the 
wholesale ignoring of his names I do not know. I purpose shortly to bu 
8, like the preceding, in which he has been unjui 
