THE LONDON CATALOGUE OF BRITISH PLANTS. 185 
t, to his 
intended that they shoul re quoted on his own authority.” Such 
are Trifolium medium, Alopecurus bulbosus, Dipsacus rae Mentha 
rotundifolia, Mentha ‘Kirsuta, Scutellaria minor—all of which must 
stand as of Hudson; while Mentha longifolia Huds., Ag ostis palustris 
Huds, , and Trifolium ochroleucon Huds., must replace M. sylvestris 
alba L., and 7. ochroleucum 
this new London Catalogue. It is well rasties and attra nti 
got up; and, being quite indispensable to workers, will do more to 
bring into use the correct nomenclature of ha plants than could 
be acco omplished in any other manner. The numbers have of course 
been rearranged ; they run to 1858, named vahatiels, which are very 
n no “ 
Bellis perennis. In this respect, however, the prese ent edition accords 
With the original issue in 1844, the numbers in which amount to 
1428, nope for a more Gritioal estimate of species and the like, 
many varieties. Comparisons of this sort are very interesting 
and suggestive ; but space will not allow us to pursue them. 
anbury has been fortunate in receiving hel 
8toups from those most fitted to give it. Prof. Babington has 
Tevised the R and, our readers will be glad to know, has pre- 
pared a series of notes on the list for this Journal. Mr. Baker takes 
the Rose es; Mr. Bennett has done Potamogeton; and the Messrs. 
oanieigi-o 
the various ways of citing authorities for names, such as ‘ (Jord. ),” 
a (Wats Bab.” 6c (66 on , « < p-) Br”; «6 «6 Poll, : 
plained. The 
tse), fa 
7" Broh Pawns,” : only the ‘first of ues is ex 
