230 NOTES ON BRITISH RUBI. 
oxam issued a ‘‘rudis with small leaves” in 1846, and “rudis 
var. microphyllus” from the same place ‘sien peewiie in 1845, and 
also in his ‘‘set”’ of 1876. These resemble the R. sertijlorus Mill, 
as illustrated in the Herb. Géné A specimen will be 
rb. Borrer possess it gathered by Mr 
e 
Purchas at Lidney, Gloucestershire. | It seems to be more nearly 
allied to R. rudis than to R. e 
38. (455) ADULA y. DENTIcULATUS Bab. is a doubtful _— 
which seems to connect I. Radula with R. rosaceus. I omit it until 
we can learn more concerning it. My specimens are from Tetley, 
near Sheffield (Newbould). I have not vet identified it with any 
described species. Should it prove distinct, I should like to call it 
fi. Newbouldii. See ‘ British Rubi,’ 195, for a full description of it. 
But if POs ere as a distinct species it can only date from this paper. 
34. (4 \OEHLERI Weihe. A specimen gathered at ee 
he true 
Pp : 
placed with it one from ‘“ Falkenberg in Saxonia,” sent to him by 
Areschoug as ‘forma typica!” I think that this latter is certainly 
our plant. have not seen a specimen of Focke’s typical plant. 
fi. Koehlert. I am not prepared to say that he is not correct in so 
doing: future study must determine it. I cannot now give any 
opinion 
c. and d. R, egregius — and R. Schlickumi Wirtg. I include 
these on the authority of Baker. He states that R. Purchastt 
ate ines ; Schlickumi has them quinate. The 
ay i of the latter plant is lax, its sepals wear a rather 
greenish coat of felt, and its petals are narrow and pinkish. The 
once of R. egrec gregius is = dense, its sepals are white-felted, and 
a which seems very near to R. Schlickumi. It grew 
Merstham, Surrey. 
e. R. pallidus Weihe. a placed various specimens of 
fi. pallidus together, and seems to have had much doubt concerning 
them. He has applied various names to them; all, as I conceive, 
which I have specimens before me. Nor it seem t R 
pallidus of The arsely dentate but broad teeth on the 
are those of my R. pailidus, not of Focke, to which 
he quotes R. G. t. xxix., which I rather incline to consider our F. 
pallidus. He also — his own ‘ _ Select.,’ 51, under - 
