232 NOTES ON BRITISH RUBI. 
to differ in other respects. R. myriacanthus has white petals. FR. 
horridus Schultz, under which poe places a plant wi . him by 
Beeby, has red flowers, accordin 
R. asperrimus Rip. There are ri British cultivated specimens 
referred to this by Génévier. one are ticketed “ fi. cor, sed . 
Mahieryis cult. ex Horto Kew, 1867.” As Baker supposed, 
seem to be a form of R. corylifolius, not Wahibergit, but pat 
The true French KR. asperrimus, placed in the sam e packet wit 
them by Généyier, seems very different, and i > apparent om 
R. diversifolius. A specimen from Sheen eine (Sept. 1876) 1s 
ed R. aspericaulis L. & M. by Génévier, and seems to be a form 
pore diversifolius. It was sent to Génévier without any name by 
87. (460) R. murasiis Génév. Under his senate of this 
plant Génévier says that my plant is a form of LR. s with white 
flowers and finely dentate leaves. But he wa — forenton to 
what I have igepees sone ered as R. mutabilis, ay which I pos- 
sess so-named by for Baker, and gathered at Cleves, Yorkshire 
Sept. 1864), and find j in his herbarium from the same place and 
late under that name. I also find there the plant of Briggs from 
amerton Foliott, named R. mutabilis v. nemor one ink, 
therefore, that the true plant grows in Yorkshire and The 
other x specimen which I had in view (‘ Br. Rub.’ a is spent 
R. Babingtonii. 
88. (461) R. Leseuner Weihe? Génévier considered our plant - 
to be the same as his, Focke excludes it, but does not tell us 
clearly where he would place it: probably he calls it - ude 
help ks to which he refers the R. Le shi of Wirt 
question will have to be reconsidered at a future sing "id refer 
following Génévier at present. 
; 480. ee .) RB. restives M.& W. This plant does not fit well 
sai Ae I have been accustomed to suppose that it 
very imperfect our grouping of 
places R. obscurifrons & W. and R. 
area pov ere under. J. infestus. It does not seem to have beet 
40. (462) BR. ieee a 
_the name peo R. byramidals, for Kaltenbe erg had long be pefore 
nt. 
our 2. Gintheri, to 
give the name L. saltwwm (1870), as is done 
ex is a far older name (1859). I have 
of the R. Guentheri of Génévier, but 
