236 NOTES ON BRITISH RUBI. 
h. He seems not to have well 
vin 
had then confused a form of R. casius with R. deltoideus. R. 
Mougeoti has rose-coloured petals, and stamens falling short of the 
styles. 2. deltoideus has white petals, and stamens exceeding the 
styles. ; 
In addition to the recorded station for this plant, I have received 
what I believe to be the same from Dr. Buchanan White, of Perth. 
c sp 
any confidence in such differences, as the highest foreign authorities 
do, that the names now adopted for our plants must not be con- 
sidered as final. 
LMIF 
e Hi. ligerinus Génév., and that I erroneously referred to it 
wmbrosus. Specimens from Naimby, Yorkshire 
(Baker, Aug. 12th, 1865), and from Twycross (Bloxam) are named 
fi. ligerinus by Génévier. We thus get rid of an ambiguous name. 
I have not yet been able to identify my var. intermedius with any 
ign form, 
R. casius ¢. hispidus is retained on account of the ambiguity of 
the term +» serpens. My plant is apparently the R. serpens G. &. G. 
and Genév., published in 1848, and perhaps the R. corymbosus 
Mill. of 1858 ; but not the R. serpens Weihe of 1881, which is the 
Ri. feronensis Pull. in the opinion of Foeke, but separate from it in 
that of Génévier, who placed it close to R. Bellardi. I have not 
seen R. feronensis in Britain, 
_PS.—I have now (July 16th) much doubt of our R. Grabowskit 
being the Same as R. montanus. It is certainly the R. Grabowski 
of Genévier. A specimen from Baker (Boerby, Yorkshire, July 21st, 
the R. montanus. It is called R. avillaris Mull. by 
