ON THE NOMENCLATURE OF SOME PROTEACER. 299 
It is obvious that—even if the extreme view be urged that the 
reading of the paper before the Linnean Society was a publication 
—the name Josephia must supersede Dryandra. The specific names 
may remain, save in the two following cases :— 
JOSEPHIA ‘“ ha Br.,” ex Knight, 
Prot., 110 (1809). 
J. sessilis Rnieht.* l. ec. 110. 
J. rachidifolia Knight, lie. 214, 
e following are the 
It is no part o 
synonymy of all the species ae ing to th 
Dryanpra R. Br., Prodr., 896, 
in the 
aw of mesaily oie 
be 
ser hs the test of practical use——is to 
urpose to give in 
in full the revised 
e genera in question ; 
I confine myself to those enumerated both by Knight and Brown :— 
Triconpyuus “ Salisb.,’ 
Prot., 121 (1809 
T’. myricafolius Sea lc. 122, 
T’. tinctorius Knight . 
T’. silaifolius Knight, . c. 122. 
’ Knight, 
9). 
I’. ferrugineus Knight, 1. c. 128. 
Rymanpra ‘“ Salisb.,’ "Knight, 
Prot., 124 (1309). 
R. excelsa Knight 
CyBete “ Salisb.,” Knight, Prot., 
C. umbellifera Knight, l. c. 124. 
ce ‘‘Salisb.,” Knight, 
Prot., 126 280) 
H. speciosa a Knig 
SorantHe “ ae ” Knight, 
Lomatia R. Br., Trans. Linn. 
Soc. x. 199 (1810). 
L. longifolia Br., l. c. 200. 
L. tinctoria Br., i 199. 
L, silaifolia Br., fe. log. 
L. ferruginea Br., l. e. 200. 
Knicutza R. Br., Trans. Linn. 
Soe. x. 193 (1810). 
K. excelsa Br., l. c. ot 
Srenocarpus R. 
Linn. Soc. 261 “ieee 
S. Forsteri Br. 
pagina -S = By as Linn. 
197 (1810). 
a. Regt cesta Be., We. 196. 
SorocerHaLus BR. Br., Trans. 
Linn. Soe. x. oe (1810). 
S. Baresi y c. 
S. lanatus 1. c. 4 
S. tenuifolia 1. ¢. 141. 
S. spatalloides 1. c. 141. 
2 va not ‘able t to identify the three oo species given by 
t (8. 
create Hb 
who has made a stady of the genu 
_ S. pinifolia, and with those 
y Brown, but this as no doubt be easy to anyone 
ontana) 
isbury’s genus Paranomus dane on a different footing from 
— published in ‘Proteé,’ having been established by 
‘Paradisus,’ under ¢. 67, published April Ist, 1807. Brown's 
reasons for sng th 
ting the name Nivenia cannot 
he name Paranomus as a synonym, he says :— 
be accepted as 
** This genus is se by Mr. Salisbury; his primary generic 
* T have cited the names as of bese = the example of R. Brown, who 
ve cr 2} i 
quotes them as of ‘‘ Knight & 
