366 CRUSTACEA OF NORTHUMBERLAND AND DURHAM 



The species belonging to this genus require, as regards 

 their distribution in our district, more attention than they have 

 yet received. The prevailing form, both littoral and pelagic, 

 is undoubtedly that here noted. But other nearly related 

 species, formerly confused with A. lougiremis (Lilljeborg) will 

 probably also be found. N.D. 



AcARTiA i.oNGiREMis (Lilljeborg). 



1878. Bias longireniis, Brady (in part), loc. cit. 



1892. Acartia lougiremis, Giesbrecht (5), p. 522, pi. xxx., 

 fig. 25, pi. xliii., fig. 25. 



This is taken not unfrequently in the tow-net, though it 

 appears to be by no means so abundant in our district as the 

 preceding species. N.D. 



Section II.— HARPACTICOIDA 



The re-arrangement of this group adopted in Professor 

 Sars' work on the " Crustacea of Norway " being not yet com- 

 plete, the family divisions are here altogether omitted. 



MiSOPHRIA PALLIDA Bocck. 



1864. Misophria pallida, Boeck, Oversigt af Norges 



Copepoder, p. 24. 

 1878. Misophria pallida, Brady (3), vol. i,, p. 79, pi. xiii., 

 figs. 11-16, pi. xviii., figs. II, 12. 

 Dredged off Hawthorn in 27 fathoms on a sandy bottom 

 (G. S. B.) D. 



Pterinopsyllus insignis G. S. Brady. 



1878. Lophophorus insignis, Brady (3), vol. i., p. 122, 



pi. xiii., figs, i-io, and pi. xv., fig. 10, and vol. iii., 



p. 23 (Pterinopsyllus). 

 In the Ray Society Monograph {loc. cit.) this species was 

 placed in the family Cyclopidae. It is in fact intermediate in 

 character between Cyclopidae and Harpacticidas, and Professor 

 G. O. Sars has informed us {in litt.) that in his forthcoming 

 work he will place the genus among Harpacticidse. We think 

 this right, and therefore adopt the new arrangement. 



