ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND FELLOWS 13 



Members of the Standing Committee on Teaching of Geology 



{1923-1925) : 



Eliot Blackwelder, Stanford University, California 

 Warren J. Mead, Madison, Wisconsin 



FELLOWS 



Leason H. Adams, B. S., Geophysical Laboratory, Washington, D. C. 



Eugene T. Allen, Ph. D., Geophysical Laboratory, Washington, D. C. 



Paul Billingsley, A. B., Anaconda Copper Mining Company, Portage, Wash- 

 ington. 



John Stafford Brown, B. S., Associate Geologist, U. S. Geological Survey, 

 Washington, D. C. 



Kirk Bryan, Ph. D., Geologist, U. S. Geological Survey, Washington. D. C. 



Victor Dolmage, Ph. D., Canadian Geological Survey, Ottawa, Canada. 



James Williams Gidley, Ph. D., U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C. 



Anna I. Jonas, Ph. D., Bridgeton, New Jersey. 



Bertram Reid MacKay, Ph.D., Geological Survey of Canada. Ottawa, Canada. 



Alexander Watts McCoy, M. A., Bartlesville, Oklahoma. 



Donald Hamilton McLaughlin, Ph. D., Berkeley, California. 



Maurice Goldsmith Mehl, Ph. D., University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. 



Charles Craig Mook, Ph. D., Metuchen, New Jersey, Research Assistant, 

 American Museum of Natural History. 



Stanley Smith, D. Sc, Assistant Professor in Geology, Queens University, 

 Kingston, Ontario. 



William Lawrence Uglow, Ph. D., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 

 Canada. 



Harry Oscar Wood, A. M., Mount Wilson Observatory, Pasadena, California. 



E. G. Woodruff, M. A., Geologist, New England Oil and Pipe Company, Tulsa, 

 Oklahoma. 



VOTE ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION 



The proposed amendment was as follows : 



Resolved, That section 4 of Article V of the Constitution be amended by 

 deleting the words "the Council," in the first line of the section, and substi- 

 tuting therefor the words "trial ballot by the Fellows." 



The President announced that the vote called for by mail on the adop- 

 tion of the proposed constitutional amendment resulted in 87 in favor of 

 the proposed amendment and 99 against it (required to adopt, 347), and 

 that therefore the amendment was defeated. He called attention to the 

 fact that with this result it was unnecessary to present the corresponding- 

 amendment to the By-Laws, which hinged directly on the adoption of 

 the proposed amendment to the Constitution. Iso further action was 

 taken by the Society. 



