90 



Amhle and Hauxley. By J. C. Hodgson. 



Haukeslaw. 



£ 

 1 

 

 1 

 1 

 



1 



Summa bonorum Rogeri filii Willielmi 

 Walteri filii Willielmi 

 Roberti de Raingtone 

 Rogeri filii Willielmi 

 Thomge filii Roberti 

 Willielmi filii Henrici 

 Rogeri filii Nicholai 

 Roberti filii Rogeri 

 Ranulfi filii Roberti 

 Adse filii Nicholai 

 Rogeri filii Rogeri 

 Rogeri filii Rogeri 



Samma hujus vilte £13 1| 

 Unde domino regi 1 3 7f 



Ambell. 



Summa bonorum Nicholai de Ambel 

 Ambel. 



Summa bonorum Symonis filii Walteri 



Willielmi filii Willielmi 

 Roberti filii Hug'di 

 Roberti filii EliaB 

 Walteri filii Rogeri 

 Ranulphi filii Henrici 

 Symonis filii Ranulphi 

 Ranulphi filii Galfridi 

 Thom.se Punder 



Summa hujus villae £6 18 

 Unde domino regi 11 0| 



4 2i 

 16 10 



unde 



i-egi 



19 

 6 

 11 



19 



1 11 

 1 3 

 1 10 

 18 



S. D. 



1 41 



1 61 



2 4^ 

 2 Oi 



1 9 



2 5 

 1 01 



1 9i 



2 10 

 2 1 

 2 8f 

 1 84 



£ s. 



D. 







s. 



D. 



2 17 



8 



unde 



regi 



5 



3 



£ s. 



D. 







s. 



D. 



14 



4 



unde 



regi 





31 



13 









, 





2i 



12 













1 



13 









„ 





2i 



13 









, 





2i 



13 









, 





2i 



13 













2i 



12 



6 





,, 





U 



17 



10 





, 





Ik 



King Edward II. came to Amble from Newbiggin 17th 

 August, 13th year of his reiga, and was there until the 

 following day, when he proceeded on his journey northward.'" 



The Chronicles of St. Albans have preserved for us an early 

 notice of the connection of the Widdringtons witli Hauxley — 

 a connection which still subsists. 



In Edward III.'s reign [1327-1377] " Sir Gerard de Widdrington, one 

 of the boldest and most unscrupulous knights in that part of the country 

 [says the ecclesiastical chronicler] being richer than the rest, and, on 



^^ Hartshorn's Itinerary, pub. privately, 1861. 



