Leefmans : Addition al Notes, 57 



Every cocoon of Apanteles hidaridis contained — for as far as they 

 were parasitized — two of these hyperparasites. 



* 



Schedius podontiae GahAN. 



The species of Podontia from which this species was bred is Podontia 



affinis GROND. The biology of this species was published by me in 



"Z)^ Tropische Natiiiir'\ under the title: De Kedongdongspringkever. 



Some particulars about the parasite are given in vol. XI of this periodical 



on page 12. 



Telenomus latisulcus CRAWFORD. 



This species was received by me from Dr. Ch. BERNARD, the Director 

 of the Tea Experiment Station at Buitenzorg. The name of the host 

 originates from Dr. BERNARD. Particulars about host and parasite, with 

 illustrations of the latter as fig. 11 and 12, can be found in Mededeelingen 

 van het Proefstation voor Thee No. LXVII. 



Apanteles homonae Roh WER. 



An illustration of this species has been given by me in: Mededeelingen 

 van het Instituut voor Plantenziekten No. 51 and Mededeelingen van het 

 Proefstation voor Thee LXXVII on plate 17 K. 



Biol. notes: The cocoon is white 5 mm long and 1,5 in width. 

 As much as 18 cocoons were obtained from one cocoon of the host. 



Apanteles hidaridis ROHWER. 



This species has been dealt with and figured by me in : Mededeelingen 

 van het Instituut voor Plantenziekten No. 35, plate 4, fig. 1. 



Macrocentrus spec. 



This species has been figured by me in the often mentioned Mede- 

 deelingen No. 51 and LXXVII on plate 14 as fig. A. 



On page 49 the name is mentioned as Microcentrus spec. This is 

 apparently a printing error, as the name is mentioned allright in the list 

 of illustrations on page 83. 



Biol, notes: From one caterpillar once only males, once only females 

 (12) and once 10 females and one male were obtained. The pupal stage 

 lasted 9 days. Cocoons brown, 5 mm in length. 



Microbracon leefmansi ROHWER. 



This species has been figured in Mededeelingen 51 and LXXVII fore- 

 mentioned on plate 15, fig. D. As regards the note of Mr. ROHWER 

 1 can add that the first report, by my letter of Nov. 27, 1919, has been 

 proved to be doubtfull as in the breedingcage, which was considered to 



