158 Journal of the F.M.S. Museums. [Noite Wills 
a 1 6 Koh Muk (Pulau Muntia) Trang, S. W. 
Siam, 5th January, 1917. [No. 3847.! 
b-c. & 2 Pasir Raja, Pulau Lontar, S. W. Siam, 
rath January, 1917. [Nos. 3892, 3898.] 
“Tris carmine, bill and feet black.” 
Male. TL.—, 481; W. 201, 203, T. 248, 240; B, 45, 48; 
WS. BIG BB. 
Female. TL. 524; W. 205; T. 284; B. 45; TS. 50. 
These specimens differ from the southern C. s. bubutus, 
Horsf. in the characters previously assigned yiz. slightly 
shorter wing, markedly shorter but much broader tail, and the 
purer, less ochraceous chestnut tint of the wings and scapulars. 
The two races of course grade into each other but a bird from 
Lenggong in Upper Perak decidedly belongs to the southern 
form. 
54. KHOPODYTES SUMATRANUS (Raffles). 
Shelley, tom. ctt. p. 391. 
a-b. & 2 Lem Pia, N. Side Telibun Straits, 
Wei Sy We Sein, jeimwvarny Aine, wo6)7. 
[Nos. 3826, 7.] 
‘Tris pearl, orbits orange red, fading posteriorly into 
vellow bill sea green, feet, greenish slate.” 
Climbing about in the characteristic awkward manner in 
a very thorny tree in an open plain. 
The species is here approaching the northern limit of its 
range. The Museum also possesses a male from Krong mon, 
interior of Trang, shot on 17th February, 1910 which has 
been omitted in the list given by Mr. Kloss and myself 
@bicy oui pee) 
55. COCCYSTES COROMANDUS (Linn.). 
Shelley, tom. cit. p. 214; Robinson and Kloss, p. 39; 
Gyldenstolpe, p. 10t. 
a. *% ad. Burau, N. W. Langkawi. 12th Decem- 
ber 1916. No. 3621. 
b-d. 3 ad. Telok Wau, Terutau. r8th-28th 
December 1916. Nos. 3660, 3760, 3781. 
e. * ad. Pulau Telibun, Trang, S. W. Siam. tst 
January 1917. No. 3805. 
“Tris hazel, bill black, feet slate.”’ 
Male. 383; W. 158; T. 230; B. 35; TS. 25. 
Females Wl 327403885) WWierts So, 102 ih 227, 62or(mlpsas suas 
WSs Ay, Qi, 
Our series in the Museum shows no confirmation of state- 
ments by Shelley and Legge that there is a sexual difference in 
size in this species but we are very deficient in females, nor 
apparently is there any difference in the colour of the sexes 
when specimens in a similar condition of plumage are 
